V. CONCLUSIONS 62. Based on the foregoing considerations of fact and law, the Commission believes that the petition is admissible under the rules of admissibility established in Articles 44 through 47 of the American Convention. 63. in this report, In consideration of the comments and conclusions set out THE INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS DECIDES TO: 1. Declare admissible the present petition with respect to alleged violations of the rights recognized in Articles 1.1, 4.1, 5.1, 8.1 and 24 of the American Convention. In addition, by application of the principle iura novit curia, the Commission will analyze in the merits stage the possible application of Article 25 of the Convention. 2. Declare inadmissible the present petition with respect to alleged violations of the rights recognized in Article 22 of the American Convention. 3. To notify this decision to the petitioner and to the State. 4. To publish this decision and to include it in its Annual Report to the General Assembly of the OAS. Done and signed in the city of Washington, D.C., on the 7th day of the month of August, 2009. (Signed): Luz Patricia Mejía Guerrero, President; Víctor E. Abramovich, First Vice-President; Felipe González, Second VicePresident; Sir Clare K. Roberts, Paulo Sérgio Pinheiro, and Paolo G. Carozza, members of the Commission. 14