2 effective and transparent coordination with federal and provincial authorities, pursuant to the provisions of Considering Clauses No. 11 and 13 of this Order, in order to ensure the effectiveness of such measures. 3. To order the State to report to the Inter-American Court every two months next following its latest report concretely and specifically on the actions taken in compliance with the orders of this Court. Especially, it is essential that the adoption of the priority measures described in this Order get reflected in reports containing concrete results in terms of the specific needs of protection for the beneficiaries of such measures, pursuant to the provisions set out in Considering Clause No. 14 of this Order. In this regard, the oversight role of the Inter-American Commission is radical for an adequate and effective follow-up on the implementation of the measures so ordered. 4. To order the representatives of the beneficiaries and the Inter-American Commission to submit their observations to the State’s reports within a term of four and six weeks, respectively, next following receipt of the referenced State’s reports. 7. The reports 8-13 submitted by the State between April 2006 and April 2007, the briefs submitted by the State on July 14 and 28 and December 12, 2006, respectively; the objections thereto made by the Commission and the representatives and the briefs and communications submitted by the representatives between April 2006, and April 2007. 8. The brief of March 24, 2007, by means of which the representatives of the beneficiaries of the provisional measures filed before the Court - based on Article 63(2) of the Convention and Article 25 of the Rules of Procedure - a request to “broaden the provisional measures to extend their effects to [all persons deprived of their liberty in the [“Almafuerte”] ...] penitentiary facility, taking into account that the persons incarcerated in the Penitenciaría Provincial de Mendoza (Provincial Penitentiary of Mendoza) are being referred to this new detention center.” They also filed a copy of the corrective writ of habeas corpus filed before a court regarding the inmate Carlos Molina-Ponce. 9. The brief of March 24, 2007, by means of which the representatives informed about the order of a criminal sentence execution judge of Mendoza, wherein the writ of habeas corpus is upheld for the benefit of [the inmate] MolinaPonce, and the effects of such writ are extended for the benefit of other 40 inmates therein incarcerated.” 10. The note of the President of the Court (hereinafter “the President”) dated March 29, 2007 by means of which he requested the State and the Inter-American Commission to submit, no later than April 10, 2007, their objections to the request made by the representatives to broaden the provisional measures, as well as to file any other information that they might have regarding the extreme seriousness and urgency of the situation and the possibility that irreparable damage may be caused to the persons that are incarcerated in the Complejo Penitenciario III (Almafuerte) (III Penitentiary Complex –Almafuerte-) for the benefit of whom the request to broaden the provisional measures had been made. Finally, the President requested the State, in compliance with the obligations assumed by virtue of the American Convention, to adopt such measures as may be necessary to protect the life and the right to humane treatment of those persons stated above while the President, in consultation with the other Judges of the Court, adopted any pertinent decisions regarding the said request to broaden provisional measures. 11. The brief of March 31, by means of which the representatives of the beneficiaries informed that on that date they had visited the Cacheuta Penitentiary, also referred to as “Almafuerte”, and that therein, they interviewed the inmates who, anonymously, reported alleged tortures. The said representatives further