16 by the Commission that originate the adoption of urgent measures in this case by the President, and stated in a positive way, its disposition for the implementation of the measures. 6. That, likewise, it has taken into consideration the arguments of the InterAmerican Commission submitted in said hearing, where it was stated that many members of the Community of Paz de San José de Apartadó did not want to be identified because of their fear for reprisals, as well as their observations in writing presented on November 22, 2000. 7. While it is true that, on other occasions, the Court has considered indispensable to individualize the people who are in danger of suffering irreparable harm in order to provide them with protective measures7, this case has special characteristics that make it different from the background considered by the Court. Indeed, the Community of Paz de San José de Apartadó, formed according to the Commission by about 1200 people, constitutes an organized community, locate in a determined geographic place, whose members can be identified and individualized and who, due to the fact of belonging to said community, all its members are in a situation of similar risk of suffering acts of aggression against their personal integrity and lives. Therefore, this Court considers that it is convenient to issue provisional protective measures in favor of the people already protected by the urgent measures ordered by Decision of the President of October 9, 2000, and for the reasons presented in the public hearing held on November 16, 2000, to expand them so that they cover all of the members of the aforementioned Community. 8. Since the situation that the Community of Paz de San José de Apartadó is going through has forced its dwellers to move to other areas of the country, it is necessary that the States guarantees that the people benefited with these measures may continue to live in the usual place of residence8 and provide the conditions necessary for the people of said Community, who had to move, to come back to their homes. 9. That Article 1(1) of the Convention stipulated the duty of the States Parties to respect the rights and freedoms recognized therein and to guarantee its free and full exercise of everybody that is subject to its jurisdiction. The States is obligated to adopt the security measures necessary for the protection of the rights and freedoms of all of the inhabitants that are under its jurisdiction; consequently, in this case, it must do for all of the members of the Community of Paz de San José de Apartadó. 10. That, as it has been asserted by this Court, it is the State’s duty to adopt the security measures to protect all of the people that are under its jurisdiction becomes 7 Cf.. Case of Haitians and Dominicans of Haitian Origin in the Dominican Republic, Provisional Measures. Decision of August 18, 2000, eighth considering clause; and Case of Haitians and Dominicans of Haitian Origin in the Dominican Republic, Provisional Measures. Decision of the President of the InterAmerican Court of Human Rights of September 14, 2000. 8 Cf.. Case of Giraldo Cardona, Provisional Measures. Decision of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of February 5, 1997, fifth considering clause; Case of Giraldo Cardona, Provisional Measures. Decision of the President of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of October 28, 1996; second operative paragraph; and Case of Colotenango, Provisional Measures. Decision of the InterAmerican Court of Human Rights of June 22, 1994, second operative paragraph.