6 paragraph; Giraldo Cardona Case. Provisional Measures. Decision of the InterAmerican Court of Human Rights of February 5, 1997. Series E No. 2, fifth considering clause; Giraldo Cardona Case. Provisional Measures. Decision of the President of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of October 28, 1996. Series E No.2, second resolution paragraph; and Colotenango Case, Provisional Measures. Decision of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of June 22, 1994, second resolution paragraph). 13. Pursuant to Article 25(4) of the Rules, the President of the Court is authorized only to order measures that are necessary and urgent in order to guarantee the effectiveness of the provisional measures that the Court may adopt in its next session (cf. inter alia, Case of the Constitutional Court. Provisional Measures. Decision of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of April 7, 2000. Series E No.2, thirteenth considering clause; Paniagua Morales et al. and Vásquez et al. Case. Provisional Measures. Decision of the President of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of February 10, 1998. Series E No. 2, seventh considering clause; and Cesti Hurtado Case. Provisional Measures. Decision of the President of the InterAmerican Court of Human Rights of July 29, 1997, Series E No.2, ninth considering clause). 14. In the present case, the Court has issued the merit decision of September 17, 1997 and the indemnification decision of November 27, 1998, and the Decision of March 8, 1998 on the interpretation of the judgement, and it keeps its jurisdiction for the purpose of supervising the execution of the Judgement (cf. Loayza-Tamayo Case. Decision of November 17, 1999. Execution of the Judgment. Series C No. 60). NOW THEREFORE: THE PRESIDENT OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS based on Article 63(2) of the American Convention on Human Rights and in use of the attributions conferred upon him by Article 25(4) of its Rules of Procedure, after consulting with all judges in the Court, DECIDES: 1. To require the State “to adopt, forthwith, the effectively guarantee Ms. María Elena Loayza-Tamayo her well as her physical, psychic, and moral integrity, so that that the Inter-American Court of Human Rights may order effects”. necessary measures to return to her country, as the provisional measures in her case have relevant 2. To require the State and the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights to report in detail, by January 12, 2001, on the situation of Ms. María Elena LoayzaTamayo, so that the Inter-American Court of Human Rights makes a timely decision. 3. To require the State to submit to the Court, by January 12, 2001, a report on the measures taken by virtue of the resolution paragraph 1 of this decision in order