relating to the temporary suspension (for a period of 120 days) of law suits and administrative claims against the National State and entities of the Public Sector.67 66. On April 19, 1991, the court certified that the civil complaint was admitted and on May 24 of that same year, the petitioner requested, as provided in Decree 383/91,68 the case be ordered to proceed.69 On May 29, the judge ordered the official letter to be issued to the General Staff of the Army so that it would report whether any investigation had been opened with regard to the facts.70 On November 8, 1991, the petitioner requested the court to order that a copy of the complaint be served.71 67. On November 14, 1991, in light of the fact that the petitioner had noted in his initial complaint that the land where the accident had occurred belonged to the 101st Air Defense Artillery group,72 and that in the pleading submitted to complete the complaint —filed on April 16, 1991— he had requested that an official letter be issued to the Property Registry for it to report who held ownership over the property on the date of the accident,73 the judge asked the petitioner to state against whom was the suit being brought.74 On March 13, 1992, the petitioner’s attorney responded by asserting that the action was being brought against the National Ministry of Defense and, notwithstanding, asked for an official letter to be issued to the Property Registry “in order to learn who held ownership over the property where the accident occurred, on the date thereof, according to what is noted in Point II [of the addendum to the complaint] (information on the property).”75 68. On July 24, 1992, the Property Registry conveyed to the court that it was necessary to cite the street map where the property was located;76 consequently, the petitioner requested on 67 See Decree No. 34/91 Temporary suspension of law suits and administrative claims against the national State and entities of the public sector (B.O.[Official Bulletin] No. 27.047 January 8, 1991) and Decree No. 53/91 Clarification of article 3 of Decree 1216/91 (B.O. 27.051 January 14, 1991). 68 See Decree No. 383/91, amending Decrees 34/91 and 53/91 relating to the temporary suspension of law suits against the State, published in the Official Bulletin on March 12, 1991. 69 Case proceedings file titled “Furlan Sebastian Claus v National State for Damages,” pages 18 back and 19. Annex to communication from the State received on October 15, 2008. 70 Case proceedings file titled “Furlan Sebastian Claus v National State for Damages,” page 19 back. Annex to communication from the State received on October 15, 2008. 71 Case proceedings file titled “Furlan Sebastian Claus v National State Alleged Damages,” page 21. Annex to communication from the State received on October 15, 2008. 72 Complaint filed on December 18, 1990, Case proceedings file titled “Furlan Sebastian Claus v National State for Damages,” page 6. Annex to communication from the State received on October 15, 2008. 73 Addendum to complaint [integración de demanda] submitted on April 16, 1991 Case proceedings file titled “Furlan Sebastian Claus v National State for Damages,” page 17. Annex to communication from the State received on October 15, 2008. 74 Case proceedings file titled “Furlan Sebastian Claus v National State for Damages,” page 22. communication from the State received on October 15, 2008. Annex to 75 Case proceedings file titled “Furlan Sebastian Claus v National State for Damages,” page 21 back. Annex to communication from the State received on October 15, 2008. “Point II” of the document, which is an addendum to the complaint [and] to which the petitioner refers, notes that his son Sebastian entered the “properties owned by the defendant, which are located in the District [Partido] Tres de Febrero, town of Ciudadela, Province of Buenos Aires, delimited by Hipolito Irigoyen, Carlos Pellegrini, Reconquista and Comesaña Streets (Land Register Nomenclature: District VI-Section D-Division XIParcels 1 and 2 squares 2795 and 28988, respectively.” Addendum to complaint submitted on April 16, 1991 Case proceedings file titled “Furlan Sebastian Claus v National State for Damages,” page 15. Annex to communication from the State received on October 15, 2008. Free translation by the IACHR. 76 Case proceedings file titled “Furlan Sebastian Claus v National State for Damages,” page 25. communication from the State received on October 15, 2008. Annex to