6 next report the State forward[ed] information with regard to this paragraph pending fulfillment.”6 In its report of August 14, 2008, Colombia pointed out that on June 12, 2008, it paid the above mentioned amount of 44,342,183.00 (forty-four millions, three hundred and forty-two thousand, one hundred and eighty-three Colombian pesos) to Iván Andrés Caballero-Parra, and it attached the respective deposit voucher. This State report and the appendixes attached thereto were timely forwarded by the Court to the representatives, who did not present any observations to the amount deposited or claims for other amounts pending with regard to the CD in favor of Iván Caballero, despite the repeated requests made by the Court and the elapsing of more than seventeen months since the above mentioned payment (supra Having Seen clauses No. 6, 7 and 14). Therefore, the Court observes that neither the representatives nor the Inter-American Commission have any objections to the amount deposited by the State to said beneficiary, reason for which it concludes that Colombia has complied with this reparation measure. 17. That regarding the difference of USD 500.00 (five hundred United States dollars) between the amount of the CD and the sum ordered in the Judgment, Colombia informed that on November 19, 2008 it paid said difference. However, the Court has not been provided a document evidencing the informed payment; consequently, the State shall forward it with its next report. 18. That at the monitoring hearing held on February 4, 2008, the representatives stated that since December 2006, the State had not delivered Mrs. María Nodelia Parra the monthly yields of the CD issued in favor of her son, Iván Andrés Caballero-Parra. However, in its report of June 2008, the State submitted deposit vouchers to the savings account of Mrs. María Nodelia Parra dated between December 2006 and January 2008. Most of these documents had been delivered to the representatives during the above mentioned hearing and, although more than twenty-one months have gone by since that moment, the representatives did not present their considerations as to the vouchers nor did they claim any other debts pending with regard to the above mentioned yields. In view of the above, the Court concludes that the State has complied with the duty to pay the legal representative of Iván Andrés Caballero-Parra the yields of the CD until January 2008. The Court requests the State to forward, together with its next report, a copy of the documents evidencing payment of the yields corresponding to the term between February and June 12, 2006, date on which the CD was paid. * * * 19. That regarding the obligation to investigate and punish those responsible for the disappearance and alleged death of the victims (fifth operative paragraph of the Judgment on the merits), the State repeated its request to the Court not to mention in any public document the information that the parties provide on the investigation of these facts, as it is in a preliminary stage under gag order. The State again reminded the different investigation measures adopted in the past and the existence of an investigation at the Unidad de Derechos Humanos de la Fiscalía General de la Nación [Human Rights Unit of the National Solicitor General]. As to these proceedings, it submitted a brief summary of the most important progress, and it enhanced that since 2006, the investigation was assigned to a new Prosecutor, who has made the proceedings move forward and has effected several 6 Case of Caballero-Delgado and Santana v. Colombia. Monitoring Compliance with Judgment. Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of February 6, 2008, Considering Clause No. eight.