29 135. Based on these considerations, the IACHR concludes that the Costa Rican State violated the rights recognized in articles 11(2), 17(2) and 24 of the American Convention, in relation to the obligations undertaken in articles 1(1) and 2 thereof, to the detriment of Gretel Artavia Murillo, Miguel Mejía Carballo, Andrea Bianchi Bruno, German Alberto Moreno Valencia, Ana Cristina Castillo León, Enrique Acuña Cartín, Ileana Henchos Bolaños, Miguel Antonio Yamuni Zeledón, Claudia María Carro Maklouf, Víctor Hugo Sanabria León, Karen Espinoza Vindas, Héctor Jiménez Acuña, Maria del Socorro Calderón P., Joaquina Arroyo Fonseca, Geovanni Antonio Vega, Carlos E. Vargas Solórzano, Julieta González Ledezma and Oriester Rojas Carranza. VI. RECOMMENDATIONS 136. Based on the analysis of the present case and the conclusions reached therein, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights recommends to the Costa Rican State that it: 1. procedures. Lift the ban on in vitro fertilization in the country through the necessary legal 2. Ensure that any regulation of the practice of in vitro fertilization once the ban is lifted be compatible with the state’s obligations with respect to the rights recognized in articles 11(2), 17(2) and 24 of the American Convention, as established throughout the present report. Take particular care to make certain that persons and/or couples that need and want the treatment have access to the technique of in vitro fertilization so that the treatment can serve its purpose. 3. Make full reparations to the victims in the present case, to include pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages and measures of satisfaction for the harm done.