-73at the time of the facts, were Commanders of the military base of San Pedro de Urabá and the roadblock in the same location, respectively.155 95(130) On October 3, 1990, the Apartadó Provincial Attorney’s Office proceeded to carry out a judicial inspection of the installations of the military base of San Pedro de Urabá. Subsequently, an aerial inspection of Pueblo Bello and the road to San Pedro de Urabá was conducted. Based on this inspection, a “strategic expert opinion” was prepared.156 95(131) On October 6, 1990, Major Marco Aurelio Quintero Torres, Tactical Officer of the National Army, issued a “tactical opinion” indicating, inter alia, that there were trails such as “those that start out from San Vicente del Congo and Maquencal, pass by the right edge of the village [and] converge again on the main highway beyond the hamlet, and the one that branches off the drivable road that goes from San José de Mulatos and goes back to the drivable road from Santa Catalina, El Carmelo, Canaletes, among others.”157 95(132) On October 6, 1990, based on an inspection made on October 3, 1990 (supra para. 95(130)), Major Jairo Antonio Puerto Medina of the National Army prepared a topographical report with his opinion on the results of an aerial reconnaissance of the zone between Pueblo Bello and the Department of Córdoba.158 95(133) On July 16, 1991, the Office of the Delegate Attorney for the defense of human rights of the Attorney General’s Office, “considering the complexity of the facts being investigated and given their gravity and importance,” decided “to grant the Special Investigations Office […] broad legal powers to inspect the routes or drivable roads to verify [the existing trails or detours from the road from Pueblo Bello to San Pedro de Urabá and whether the trucks that transported the peasants who disappeared on January 14, 1990, could have used them to reach the place where the vehicles were found at Las Cruces].”159 95(134) On August 9, 1991, the Special Investigations Office of the Judicial Police of the Attorney General’s Office agreed to provide the collaboration requested by the Delegate Attorney’s Office and, consequently, to inspect the zone where these routes were located.160 95(135) On September 3, 1991, the Special Investigations Office of the Judicial Police of the Attorney General’s Office submitted its report with its findings on the 155 Cf. decision of April 30, 1990, issued by the Office of the Delegate Attorney for the defense of human rights (file of useful evidence submitted by the State, folio 5030 to 5032). 156 Cf. judicial inspection procedure of October 3, 1990, issued by the Apartadó Provincial Attorney’s Office (file of useful evidence submitted by the State, folio 5158 to 5161), and strategic expert opinion of October 5, 1990, issued by Lieutenant Martías Hernán Bagett, strategist (file of useful evidence submitted by the State, folios 5167 to 5168). 157 Cf. “tactical opinion” of October 6, 1990, issued by Major Marco Aurelio Quintero Torres, Tactical Officer of the National Army (file of useful evidence submitted by the State, folio 5165). 158 Cf. topographic report of October 6, 1990, issued by Major Jairo Antonio Puerto Medina (file of useful evidence submitted by the State, folios 5169 to 5170). 159 Cf. decision of July 16, 1991, issued by la Delegate Attorney for the Defense of Human Rights (file of attachments to the application, tome III, attachment C11, folio 683). 160 Cf. decision of August 9, 1991, of the Special Investigations Office of the Judicial Police (file of attachments to the application, tome III, attachment C12, folios 684 to 686).