47 and ninety-one cents) for Casa Alianza and the sum of US$ 11,000.00 (eleven thousand United States dollars) for CEJIL. XI METHOD OF COMPLIANCE Arguments of the representatives of the victims’ next of kin 110. In their reparations brief, the representatives of the victims’ next of kin proposed that the compensation payment should made by a single payment of the total amount calculated at the time of the execution of judgment. During the public hearing, in view of the State’s proposal for a friendly settlement, the representatives indicated that, even though the State had shown good intentions, this was not the appropriate procedural stage for implementing such a proposal. Nevertheless, they were ready to work with the State in executing the judgment on reparations delivered by the Court. The Commission’s arguments 111. The Commission requested the Court that: a) Guatemala be obliged to pay the compensation amounts that had been established within six months of the respective judgment; b) payment of the compensation be made either in United States dollars or the equivalent in quetzales; c) the need to maintain the purchasing power of the amount that the Court orders to be paid should be taken into account when calculating the compensation and determining the form of payment, considering devaluation and depreciation; d) payment of the compensation be exempt from any current or future taxes; e) it find that the Court would maintain its competence in this matter until it was verified that all the measures of reparation ordered had been complied with. The State’s arguments 112. During the public hearing, Guatemala proposed two options for determining reparations to the Court. First, the possibility of negotiating an agreement with the parties on the form and amount of the compensations, within a period of time defined by the Court. Second, if that measure was not accepted, it proposed that a court of arbitration should be established, which would be responsible for determining the pecuniary compensation within a period to be defined by the Court, prior to which the parties would sign a commitment to respect the arbitrator’s decision. The agreement reached would, in any case, be submitted to the Court for its approval and the Court would reserve the right to decide on the matter should the parties not reach an agreement.