63 1990. In Article 6 of said Law it was stated that it was a public order law, and that it would have a retroactive effect as of December 4, 1990. According to its Article 7 it would enter into effect since its issuance and would remain in effect until December 31, 1991;36 Workers' Union of the Water Resources and Electric Power Institute (SITIRHE) and the Workers' Union of the National Telecommunications Institute (SITINTEL)"; judgment of the Full Supreme Court of Panama of May 23, 1991, concerning the four unconstitutionality actions brought December 21 and 24, 1990, by Vicente Archibold-Blake, in representation of Isaac Rodríguez; by Santander Tristán-Donoso et al.; and by Basilio Chong-Gómez, in representation of Rolando Miller et al., against Law 25 of December 14, 1990; judgment of the Third Administrative Conflicts Section of the Supreme Court of June 30, 1993, in connection with the actions brought by Vicente Archibold-Blake, in representation of Luis Anaya, Juan Bautista Quijada-B., Cayetano Cruz, and Jaime E. Camarena; judgment of the Administrative Conflicts Section of the Supreme Court of December 18, 1992, relative to the actions brought by Vicente ArchiboldBlake, in representation of Eduardo Gaslín-Caballero, Alfredo Guerra, Raúl González-Rodaniche, Melva Guerrero-Samudio, Esther M. Guerra, Evangelista Granja-C., Antonio González, Erick Alexis González, Manuel J. Herrera-S., Aníbal Herrera-Santamaría, Félix Herrera-C., Magaly V.-de-Herrera, Pompilio IbarraRamírez, Daniel Jiménez-H., Rolando Jiménez, José A. Kellys-S., Gilberto Antonio Leguisamo, Dirie Lauchú -Ponce, Perlina Loban -de-Andrade, Eric E. Lara-Moran , Darien C. Linares, Zilka A. Lou-M.-, Dennis LassoE., Orán Darío Miranda-Gutiérrez, Luis E. Montero, Valentín Morales-V., Raúl Murrieta-Ríos, Natalio Murillo, Jorge Martínez-F., Luis A. Miranda, Esteban Nash-Campos, Evelio Otero-Rodríguez, Antonio A. Ornano-C., Gustavo Alexis Ortiz-G., Luis H. Osorio, and Omar E. Oses; judgment of the Third Administrative Conflicts Section of the Supreme Court of July 30, 1993, in connection with the actions brought by Carlos del-Cid, in representation of Ivanor Alonso, Arnoldo Aguilar-U., Lionel Ángulo-C., Carlos Catline, Judith E. de-laRosa-de-Correa, Alfonso Chambers, Eduardo Cobos, Orlando Camarena, Alexis Díaz, Edgar de-León, Luis Coronado, and Elberto Luis Cobos-R.; and record of the case before the Full Supreme Court concerning the three unconstitutionality actions brought by Vicente Archibold-Blake, in representation of Isaac Rodríguez; by Santander Tristán-Donoso et al; and by Basilio Chong-Gómez, in representation of Rolando Miller et al., against Law 25 of December 14, 1990. 36 cfr. Law 25 of December 14, 1990, published in the Official Gazette of Panama N° 21.687 of December 17, 1990; testimony of Rogelio Cruz-Ríos delivered before the Inter-American Court on January 26, 2000; judgment of the Full Supreme Court of May 23, 1991, concerning the three unconstitutionality actions brought by Vicente Archibold-Blake in representation of Isaac Rodríguez; by Santander Tristán-Donoso et al.; and by Basilio Chong-Gómez in representation of Rolando Miller et al., against Law 25 of December 14, 1990; Report of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs entitled "Reservations to clarify Report N° 37/97 (Case 11.325) issued by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights of the Organization of American States (OAS)," addressed on December 10, 1997, to the Ambassador of Panama and Permanent Representative to the OAS; December 13, 1990, minutes of the Legislative Assembly pertaining to the discussion of the Law 25 draft bill; judgment of the Third Administrative Conflicts Section of the Supreme Court of June 30, 1993, in connection with the actions brought by Vicente Archibold-Blake, in representation of Luis Anaya, Juan Bautista Quijada-B., Cayetano Cruz, and Jaime E. Camarena; judgment of the Third Administrative Conflicts Section of the Supreme Court of December 18, 1992, in connection with the actions brought by Carlos del-Cid, in representation of Ivanor Alonso, Arnoldo Aguilar-U., Lionel Ángulo-C., Carlos Catline, Judith E. de-la-Rosa-de-Correa, Alfonso Chambers, Eduardo Cobos, Orlando Camarena, Alexis Díaz, Edgar de-León, Luis Coronado, and Elberto Luis Cobos; volume I of the record of the proceedings before the Administrative Conflicts Section of the Supreme Court in connection with the full-jurisdiction administrative conflicts actions brought by Vicente Archibold Blake, in representation of Magaly V. de-Herrera, Félix Herrera-C., Aníbal Herrera-Santamaría, Manuel J. HerreraS., Eric Alexis González, Antonio González, Evangelista Granja-C., Esther M. Guerra, Melva GuerreroSamudio, Raúl González-Rodaniche, Alfredo Guerra, and Eduardo Gaslín-Caballero; volume I of the record of the case before the Administrative Conflicts Section of the Supreme Court, concerning the fulljurisdiction administrative conflicts actions brought by Vicente Archibold-Blake in representaion of Miguel Angel Osorio, Sergio Ochoa-Castro, Christian Eliécer-Pérez, Rúben D. Pérez, Giovani E. Prado-S., Fredys Pérez, Miguel L. Bermúdez-T., and Andrés Bermúdez; volume I of the record of the case before the Administrative Conflicts Section of the Supreme Court, concerning the full-jurisdiction administrative conflicts actions brought by Vicente Archibold-Blake, in representation of Luis Anaya, Juan Bautista Quijada-B., Cayetano Cruz, and Jaime E. Camarena; volume I of the record of the case before the Administrative Conflicts Section of the Supreme Court, concerning the full-jurisdiction administrative conflicts actions brought by Vicente Archibold-Blake, in representation of Andrés A. Aleman -L., Santiago Alvarado, Pedro Atencio-Madrid, Javier Atencio-Arauz, Víctor Arauz-Núñez, Rubén D. Barraza, Luis BernuilZ., Alba Oritela-Berrio, José Inés Blanco-Obando, and Jaime A. Batista; and record of the case before the Full Supreme Court concerning the three unconstitutionality actions brought by Vicente Archibold-Blake, in representation of Isaac Rodríguez; by Santander Tristán-Donoso et al; and by Basilio Chong-Gómez, in representation of Rolando Miller et al., against Law 25 of December 14, 1990.