66 q. on January 23, 1991, the Cabinet Council made the profiling which the “paragraph” of Article 2 of Law 25 empowered it to make. By means of Resolution 10, it established that the work stoppages and abrupt collective interruptions of the work in the public sector attempted against democracy and the constitutional order, and that “any public servant who would, as of December 4, 1990, have promoted, convoked, organised or participated in, or who would in the future promote, convoke, organise, or participate in work stoppages without complying with the established procedures and restrictions established in the Law, or in abrupt collective interruptions of the work in the public sector, would be subject to dismissal for cause.” The resolution was published in the Official Gazette of Panama N° 21.718 of February 4, 1991;39 r. Law 25 authorised the Executive Branch and the directors of the autonomous and semi-autonomous institutions, State and municipal enterprises, and other public agencies of the State to declare non subsistent, subject to a previous identification, the appointments of those public servants who took part or who would take part in of the Legislative Assembly of December 13, 1990, pertaining to the discussion of the Law 25 draft bill; record of the case before the Full Supreme Court concerning the three unconstitutionality actions brought on December 21 and 24, 1990, by Vicente Archibold-Blake, in representation of Isaac Rodríguez; by Santander Tristán-Donoso et al; and by Basilio Chong-Gómez, in representation of Rolando Miller et al., against Law 25 of December 14, 1990 39 cfr. Cabinet Council Resolution N° 10 of January 23, 1991, published in the Official Gazette of Panama N° 21.718, of February 4, 1991; report of the expert Humberto Ricord, delivered before the Inter-American Court on January 26 , 2000; reply to the full-jurisdiction action brought before the Third Section of the Supreme Court on March 9, 1992, by Vicente Archibold-Blake in representation of Miguel Angel Osorio et al.; judgment of the Administrative Conflicts Section of the Supreme Court of June 21, 1993, in connection with the actions brought by Vicente Archibold-Blake in representation of Miguel Angel Osorio, Jaime Salinas-M., Giovanni E. Prado-S., Tomás A. Pretelt, Rubén D. Pérez-G., Sergio OchoaCastro, Sildee Ríos-de-Silva, Dorindo A. Ríos, Alidio Rivera, Sandra C. de-Romero, Ernesto RomeroAcosta, Isaac M.-Rodríguez, Fredys Pérez-M., Dony Arcesa Ramos-Quintero, Ricardo R. Ríos, Luis G. Risco-B., Ilka de-Sánchez, José Santamaría, Luis Arturo Sánchez, Enigno Saldaña, Teresa R. de-Sierra, Manuel Enrique Valencia, Christian Eliécer Pérez, Rodolfo G. Vence-R., Marisina del C. Ubillus-D., Rafael Tait-Yepes, Víctor Julio Soto, Cristóbal Segundo Jr., Elvira A. de-Solórzano, Enrique C. Sellhom-M., Rodolfo A. Wynter, Ricardo A. Trujillo-R., Luis Olmedo-Sosa-C., Sonia de-Smith, and Damiel S. Trejos-G.; judgment of the Full Supreme Court of May 23, 1991, concerning the three unconstitutionality actions brought December 21 and 24, 1990, by Vicente Archibold-Blake in representation of Isaac Rodríguez; by Santander Tristán-Donoso et al.; and by Basilio Chong-Gómez in representation of Rolando Miller et al., against Law 25 of December 14, 1990; opinion of March 21, 1991 by the Office of the Administrative Attorney of the Prosecutorial Agency, concerning the three unconstitutionality actions brought December 21 and 24, 1990, by Vicente Archibold-Blake, in representation of Isaac Rodríguez; by Santander TristánDonoso et al.; and by Basilio Chong-Gómez, in representation of Rolando Miller et al., against Law 25 of December 14, 1990; judgment of the Third Administrative Conflicts Section of the Supreme Court of June 30, 1993, in connection with the actions brought by Vicente Archibold-Blake, in representation of Luis Anaya, Juan Bautista Quijada-B., Cayetano Cruz, and Jaime E. Camarena; volume I of the record of the proceedings before the Administrative Conflicts Section of the Supreme Court in connection with the fulljurisdiction administrative conflicts actions brought by Carlos del-Cid in representation of Yadira Delgado, Luis Alfonso Estribi-R., Alfonso Fernández-Urriola, Eleno Augusto García-Castro, Alejandrina GordonRivera, Ricardo Antonio Guiseppitt-Pérez, Rigoberto Isaacs-Rozzi, and Marisol Landau; volume I of the record of the case before the Administrative Conflicts Section of the Supreme Court, concerning the fulljurisdiction administrative conflicts actions brought by Vicente Archibold-Blake, in representation of Luis Anaya, Juan Bautista Quijada-B., Cayetano Cruz, and Jaime E. Camarena; volume I of the record of the case before the Administrative Conflicts Section of the Supreme Court, concerning the full-jurisdiction administrative conflicts actions brought by Carlos del-Cid in representation of Ivanor Alonso, Arnoldo Aguilar-U., Lionel Angulo-C, Luis Coronado, Elberto Luis Cobos, Carlos Catline-Todd, Judith de-la-Rosa-deCorrea, and Alfonso Chambers; and record of the case before the Full Supreme Court concerning the three unconstitutionality actions brought by Vicente Archibold-Blake, in representation of Isaac Rodríguez; by Santander Tristán-Donoso et al; and by Basilio Chong-Gómez, in representation of Rolando Miller et al., against Law 25 of December 14, 1990.