2 6. The Order on compliance with judgment rendered by the Court on November 27, 2003, the sixth, seventh and eighth considering clauses of which stated that: 6. […] in the course of monitoring compliance with the judgment on reparations in this case, the Court […] verified that the State paid the compensation ordered in favor of the victim and her next of kin and the fees and expenses, in accordance with the fourth and seventh operative paragraphs of the judgment on reparations […]. 7. […] María Elena Loayza Tamayo ha[d] been reinstated in educational center No. 2057 and in the College of Dramatic Art of the Ministry of Education […]. 8. […] the Court consider[ed] it essential that the State [w]ould provide information to the Court on progress in compliance with the judgment on reparations, in particular, as regards: a) The reinstatement of Mrs. Loayza Tamayo in the teaching sector in public institutions and the measures taken to ensure that the amount of her salary and other benefits [would be] equivalent to the remuneration she was receiving for these activities in the public and private sector at the time of her detention (first operative paragraph of the judgment on reparations of November 27, 1998); b) Payment of the salary and work-related benefits to which María Elena Loayza Tamayo is entitled for uninterrupted employment and the guarantee of full enjoyment of her retirement benefits (first and second operative paragraph of the judgment on reparations of November 27, 1998); c) The adoption of measures of domestic law to ensure that no adverse decision delivered in the proceedings against Mrs. Loayza Tamayo in the domestic courts [would] ha[ve] any legal effect whatsoever (third operative paragraph of the judgment on reparations of November 27, 1998); and d) The investigation of the facts of the case, and the identification and punishment of those responsible (sixth operative paragraph of the judgment of November 27, 1998). In that regard, the Court decided as follows: 1. To urge the State to adopt all necessary measures to comply effectively and promptly with the judgment on reparations of November 27, 1998, delivered by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in the Loayza Tamayo case, as established in Article 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights. 7. The Order of the Inter-American Court of March 3, 2005, whereby it declared: 1. That, pursuant to Considering clause No. 8 of this Order, the State has fully complied with the sixth operative paragraph of the Judgment on the merits delivered by the Court on September 17, 1997, and the fourth and seventh operative paragraphs of the Judgment on reparations delivered by the Court on November 27, 1998, as to payment to the victim and the victim’s next of kin of fair compensation and any fees and expenses they may have incurred in the instant case. 2. That it [would] keep open the proceeding for monitoring compliance with the aspects pending fulfillment in the instant case […] Furthermore, the Court decided: 1. To call upon the State to adopt all necessary measures to comply effective[ly] and promptly with the pending measures ordered by the Court in the Judgment on reparations, as well as the Order of November 27, 2003 and this Order, pursuant to Article 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights.