2 b) provide the appropriate treatment, free of charge, as required by the families of victims executed in the case (operative paragraph sixteen of the Judgment); c) take the necessary actions to guarantee security so that former residents of the villages of El Aro and La Granja, who have been displaced, can return to El Aro or La Granja, as appropriate and if they so desire (operative paragraph sixteen of the Judgment); d) hold a public ceremony to acknowledge international responsibility for the facts of the case, in the presence of senior officials (operative paragraph eighteen of the Judgment); e) implement a housing program through which it provides adequate housing to the surviving victims who lost their homes and who require such housing (operative paragraph nineteen of the Judgment); f) install a plaque in a suitable public location in La Granja and El Aro, so that new generations are aware of the facts of the case (operative paragraph twenty of the Judgment); g) publish in the Official Gazette, on a sole occasion, the chapter on proven facts of the Judgment, without corresponding footnotes, and the operative paragraphs of the Judgment (twenty-second operative paragraph of the Judgment), and h) pay the persons listed in Annexes I, II and III of the Judgment compensation for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages ( operative paragraphs twenty-three and twenty-four of the Judgment). 3. The letter of November 17, 2009, whereby the Republic of Colombia (hereinafter "the State") submitted its third report on compliance with the Judgment. 4. The brief of April 5, 2010, whereby the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (hereinafter "the Inter-American Commission" or "the Commission") submitted its observations on the State report (supra Having Seen 3). 5. The Order of the President of the Court of April 29, 2010, in which the State, the representatives and the Inter-American Commission were convened to a private hearing on monitoring compliance to analyze the implementation of the reparation measure provided for in operative paragraph six of the Judgment, concerning the medical, psychiatric and psychological treatment as well as similar reparation measures ordered in seven other cases1. 6. The private audience on monitoring compliance held on May 22, 2010 at the headquarters of the Court to address the issue of the reparation measures on medical, psychiatric and psychological treatment. 7. The order of the Court of May 25, 2010, whereby it resolved to authorize the State to pay a percentage of the compensation awarded to the three sons of Ms. María Oliva Calle, child victims, so as to purchase a home. 8. The letter of July 26, 2010, whereby the representatives of victims (hereinafter "the representatives") presented their observations and certain information requested in the Order of July 7, 2009. 1 Case of 19 Tradesmen v. Colombia. Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of July 5, 2004. Series C No. 109; Case of Gutiérrez Soler v. Colombia. Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of September 12, 2005. Series C No. 132; Case of the "Mapiripán Massacre" v. Colombia. Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of September 15, 2005. Series C No. 134; Case of the Pueblo Bello Massacre v. Colombia. Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of January 31, 2006. Series C No. 140; Case of La Rochela Massacre v. Colombia. Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of May 11, 2007. Series C No. 163; Case of Escué Zapata v. Colombia. Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of July 4, 2007. Series C No. 165 and Case of Valle Jaramillo et el. v. Colombia. Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of November 27, 2008. Series C No. 192.