40 and 26 days service in the Public Administration132. regime established in Decree Law No. 20530133. He is subject to the pension 89(dd) The amount of the retirement pension he was paid on February 21, 1992, was S.2,700.74 (two thousand seven hundred soles and seventy-four cents)134. From April to October 1992, the pension payment was suspended, without any prior notice or procedure and, as of November that year, the pension was reduced by approximately 81% to the sum of S.504.00 (five hundred and four soles)135. 89(ee) On July 1, 1992, Mr. Bartra Vásquez filed an application for amparo against the SBS136. On August 7, 1992, the Twenty-sixth Civil Court of Lima ordered as a precautionary measure that the SBS should pay the retirement pension to which the plaintiff was entitled137. This decision was appealed and, on September 14, 1992, the Second Civil Chamber of the Superior Court of Justice of Lima confirmed the said The SBS paid Mr. Bartra Vásquez the pension precautionary measure138. corresponding to the months when payments had been suspended, but reducing the amount to S.504.00 (five hundred and four soles)139. On January 7, 1993, the lower Civil Court of Lima declared that the application for amparo was admissible and ordered the SBS “to comply by restoring to the plaintiff, Bartra Vásquez, the 132 Cf. supra note 130. 133 Cf. administrative decision SBS No. 254-2002 of March 12, 2002, with regard to Reymert Bartra Vásquez (file on merits and possible reparations, tome IV, appendix 6 of the communication of July 22, 2002, presented by the representatives of the alleged victims and their next of kin, folios 991 to 994). 134 Cf. SBS payroll of February 1992, with regard to Reymert Bartra Vásquez (file of appendices to the application, appendix 31, folio 153). 135 Cf. application for amparo of June 30, 1992, filed by Reymert Bartra Vásquez on July 1, 1992, before the Twenty-sixth Civil Court (file of appendices to the application, appendix 42, folios 173 to 175); decision of the lower Civil Court of Lima delivered on January 7, 1993, regarding the application for amparo filed by Reymert Bartra Vásquez (file of appendices to the application, appendix 44, folios 178 to 180); MEF payroll of February 1993, with regard to Reymert Bartra Vásquez (file of appendices to the application, appendix 34, folio 157); and administrative decision SBS No. 254-2002 of March 12, 2002, with regard to Reymert Bartra Vásquez (file on merits and possible reparations, tome IV, appendix 6 of the communication of July 22, 2002, presented by the representatives of the alleged victims and their next of kin, folios 991 to 994). 136 Cf. application for amparo of June 30, 1992, filed by Reymert Bartra Vásquez on July 1, 1992, before the Twenty-sixth Civil Court (file of appendices to the application, appendix 42, folios 173 to 175). 137 Cf. application brief submitted by the Inter-American Commission (file on merits and possible reparations, tome I, folio 20); and brief on requests, arguments and evidence presented by the representatives of the alleged victims and their next of kin (file on merits and possible reparations, tome I, folios 170 and 174). 138 Cf. supra note 137. 139 Cf. supra note 137.