2 next of kin or their duly accredited legal representatives, within three months of the notification of [the] judgment. 7. To reserve the authority to review and approve the agreement mentioned in the previous operative paragraph and, should no agreement be reached, to continue the reparations procedure. 2. The Court’s November 30, 2001 Judgment on reparations. In the operative paragraphs of that Judgment the Court decided: unanimously, 1. To approve, under the terms of this Judgment, the agreement on reparations signed on August 22, 2001 by the State of Peru and the victims, their next of kin and their representatives. 2. That the State of Peru [was to] pay: a) US$175,000.00 (one hundred and seventy-five thousand United States dollars) to each of the following surviving victims: Natividad Condorcahuana Chicaña, Felipe León León, Tomás Livias Ortega, and Alfonso Rodas Alvítez (or Albitres, Albites or Alvitrez); b) US$175,000.00 (one hundred and seventy-five thousand United States dollars) to the beneficiaries of the reparations pertaining to each of the following deceased victims (supra par. 29): Placentina Marcela Chumbipuma Aguirre, Luis Alberto Díaz Astovilca, Octavio Benigno Huamanyauri Nolazco, Luis Antonio León Borja, Filomeno León León, Lucio Quispe Huanaco, Tito Ricardo Ramírez Alberto, Teobaldo Ríos Lira, Manuel Isaías Ríos Pérez, Javier Manuel Ríos Rojas, Alejandro Rosales Alejandro, Nelly María Rubina Arquiñigo, Odar Mender (or Méndez) Sifuentes Nuñez, and Benedicta Yanque Churo; and c) US$250,000.00 (two hundred and fifty thousand United States dollars) to the beneficiaries of the reparations pertaining to the deceased victim Máximo León León. The State of Peru [was to] make all the respective payments for these reparations during the first quarter of fiscal year 2002, in accordance with the provisions set forth in paragraphs 35 to 40 of th[e] Judgment. 3. That the State of Peru [was to] grant the beneficiaries of the reparations their healthcare expenses, granting them free care at the respective health care center according to their place of residence and at the respective specialized institute or hospital of referral, in the areas of out-patient consultation, diagnostic support procedures, medicine, specialized care, diagnostic procedures, hospitalization, surgery, childbirth, traumatological rehabilitation, and mental health, in accordance with the provisions set forth in paragraphs 42 and 45 of [the] Judgment. 4. That the State of Peru [was to] provide the beneficiaries of the reparations the following educational benefits, in accordance with the provisions set forth in paragraphs 43 and 45 of [the] Judgment: a) scholarships through the Instituto Nacional de Becas y Crédito Educativo to study in Academies, Institutes and Centros de Ocupación Ocupacional (sic) and support to beneficiaries interested in furthering their education, “through the National Directorate of Secondary and Higher Technological Education”; and b) educational materials; official textbooks for students in primary and secondary schooling; uniforms; class work materials, and others. 5. That the State of Peru [was to] make the following non-monetary reparations, pursuant to the provisions set forth in paragraphs 44 and 45 of [the] Judgment: