life would normally have taken, which represents serious harm to her way of life56. d) the foregoing considerations (supra para. 88.a and b) are applicable to the victim’s adoptive father or stepfather and brothers, who, as members of a close-knit family, had a close relationship with José Carlos Trujillo Oroza, lived in the same house with him, and personally experienced the uncertainty about the whereabouts of the victim, so that they could not be indifferent to the severe suffering of José Carlos. Also, in the case of the victim’s brothers, it should be recalled that, according to the most recent jurisprudence of the Court, it can be presumed that the death of a person causes his siblings nonThe amount corresponding to the non-pecuniary pecuniary damage57. damage caused to Walter Solón Romero Gonzales will be delivered to his spouse and his two sons in equal parts. 89. Bearing in mind the different aspects of the damage referred to above, cited by the representatives of the victim and his next of kin and endorsed by the Commission, where they are pertinent and respond to the particularities of the case, the Court establishes in fairness the value of the compensation for non-pecuniary damage that should be paid to the victim’s next of kin, as indicated in the following table: Reparation for non-pecuniary damage 4) VICTIM AND HIS NEXT OF KIN 5) AMOUNT José Carlos Trujillo Oroza (victim) US$100,000.00 Gladys Oroza de Solón Romero US$80,000.00 (mother) Walter Solón Romero Gonzales US$25,000.00 (adoptive father) Pablo Erick Solón Romero Oroza US$20,000.00 (brother) Walter Solón Romero Oroza (brother) US$20,000.00 TOTAL AMOUNT US$245,000.00 C) OTHER FORMS OF REPARATION 90. In this section, the Court will proceed to determine those measures of compensation for non-pecuniary damage that have no financial value. Arguments of the representatives of the victim and his next of kin 91. The representatives of the victim and his next of kin requested the Court to order the following measures of satisfaction: a) investigation into the whereabouts of the disappeared person and return of his body 56 cf. Loayza Tamayo case. Reparations, supra note 31, paras. 147-154; and Cantoral Benavides case. Reparations, supra note 3, para. 60. 57 cf. Cantoral Benavides case. Reparations, supra note 3, paras. 37 and 61d); The “Street Children” case (Villagrán Morales et al.). Reparations, supra note 3, para. 68; and The “White Van” case (Paniagua Morales et al.). Reparations, supra note 4, paras. 110, 126 and 144.