76 c) the Moiwana community members’ connection to their ancestral territory was brusquely severed – dispersing them throughout Suriname and French Guiana. Since a N’djuka community’s relationship to its traditional land is of vital spiritual, cultural and material importance, their forced displacement has devastated them emotionally, spiritually, culturally, and economically (supra paragraph 86(42)). 196. In consideration of the severe circumstances discussed above, the Tribunal sees fit, on grounds of equity, to direct the State to grant an indemnity for moral damages of US$10,000.00 (ten thousand dollars of the United States of America), or the equivalent in national currency, to each of the victims indicated in paragraphs 180 and 181 of the instant judgment. The indemnity for moral damages shall be granted to each of the victims pursuant to the terms stipulated in paragraphs 178 and 179 of the instant judgment. D) OTHER FORMS OF REPARATION (Satisfaction measures and non-repetition guarantees) Arguments of the Commission 197. With regard to measures of satisfaction and guarantees of non-repetition, the Commission requested that the Court order Suriname to complete the following measures: a) adopt all measures required to ensure the prompt and effective investigation of the attack on Moiwana Village and subsequent denial of justice in order to ensure that those responsible are tried and punished; b) facilitate the return of any former members of Moiwana Village, their family members and any family members of those killed who wish to resume life in that community. This measure must include: i) formal legal recognition of their right to own and occupy the traditional seat of the community; ii) guarantees to ensure their personal security; and iii) the construction, furnishing and staffing of educational and health facilities in the community; c) locate the remains of the victims who were killed in the massacre at Moiwana and whose bodies have not been recovered, and exhume them and/or take other measures necessary to serve the wishes of their families with respect to an appropriate final resting place; d) erect a monument to memorialize both the massacre at Moiwana Village and its victims, in consultation with and taking fully into account the wishes of the survivors and family members of those killed; and e) issue a formal apology to the designated Gaanman of the N’djuka community for the denial of judicial protection and forced displacement. 198. The Commission based the abovementioned requests on the following considerations: 1. The criminal investigation