2 d) To Isaac Alonso Cantoral Benavides, in the form and under the conditions stipulated in paragraph 62 of this judgment, the sum of US$ 5,000.00 (five thousand United States dollars) or the equivalent in Peruvian currency. e) To José Antonio Cantoral Benavides, in the form and under the conditions stipulated in paragraph 62 of this judgment, the sum of US$3,000.00 (three thousand United States dollars) or the equivalent in Peruvian currency. 3. That the State shall pay the victim’s representatives the sum of US$ 8,000.00 (eight thousand United States dollars) or the equivalent in Peruvian currency in costs and expenses, in the form and under the conditions stipulated in paragraph 87 of this judgment. 4. That through the procedures dictated by its domestic laws, the State shall reverse the verdict of conviction that the Peruvian Supreme Court delivered against Luis Alberto Cantoral Benavides, pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 77 of this judgment. 5. That the State shall nullify any court, government, criminal or police proceedings there may be against Luis Alberto Cantoral Benavides in connection with the events in this case and shall expunge the corresponding records, pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 78 of this Judgment. 6. That the State shall provide Luis Alberto Cantoral Benavides with a grant to pursue advanced or university studies, in order to defray the costs of the professional degree that the victim elects to pursue, as well as his living expenses for the duration of the victim’s studies, at a center of recognized academic excellence selected by mutual agreement between the victim or his representatives and the State, in furtherance of paragraph 80 of this judgment. 7. That the State must publish, at least one time, in the Official Gazette and another newspaper with nationwide circulation, the operative part of the judgment the Court delivered on the merits on August 18, 2000, and make a public apology acknowledging its responsibility in this case, in order to prevent a repetition of these events, in furtherance of paragraphs 79 and 81 of the present judgment. 8. That the State is to provide medical treatment and psychotherapy to Gladys Benavides López, in Peru, in furtherance of paragraph 51 e) of the present judgment. 9. That the State is to investigate the facts of the present case and identify and punish the responsible parties, in furtherance of paragraph 70 of the present judgment. [...] 3. Paragraph 97 of the judgment on reparations delivered by the Court, which establishes that “[s]hould the State default on its obligation, it will pay interest on the balance owed, at the banking interest rate in effect in Peru for overdue payments.” 4. The note of the State of Peru (hereinafter “the State” or “Peru”) of February 6, 2002, in which it advised that on January 31, 2002, it had carried out a public act to redress the damage caused to Luis Alberto Cantoral Benavides, “in compliance [...with the] seventh operative paragraph of the judgment on reparations delivered by the Court […]”. 5. The brief of the State of February 25, 2002, in which it advised that it had initiated administrative measures to provide the funds required to pay the agreed compensation and that the Government had met with the victim “to examine jointly the support for [his] further education.” It indicated that it “is very difficult to comply with [what Luis Alberto Cantoral has proposed], because the Peruvian State does not finance studies abroad and, particularly, in private universities for individuals,” but that “it would make all possible efforts to comply with the victim’s