regard to the obligations established in Articles 1.1 and 2 of the same instrument. 74. Based on the information supplied by the petitioners, the Commission does not have sufficient elements to rule on the possible characterization of a violation of the right enshrined in Article 24 of the American Convention. V. CONCLUSIONS 75. Based on the elements of fact and of law stated herein and, without prejudging the merits of the case, the Inter-American Commission concludes that this case meets the admissibility requirements established in Articles 46 and 47 of the American Convention and therefore, THE INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS, DECIDES: 1. To declare admissible the petition under study, with regard to the rights enshrined in Articles 21, 8 and 25 of the American Convention in connection with the obligations established in Articles 1.1 and 2 of the same instrument. 2. To declare inadmissible the petition under study, with regard to the right enshrined in Article 24 of the American Convention and to Article 9 of the Protocol of San Salvador. 3. To notify the State and the petitioners of this decision. 4. To proceed with the analysis of the merits of the case. 5. To publish this decision and include in its Annual Report to the General Assembly of the OAS. Done and signed in the city of Washington, D.C., on March 19, 2009. (Signed): Luz Patricia Mejía Guerrero, President; Víctor E. Abramovich, First Vice-president; Felipe González, Second Vicepresident; Sir Clare K. Roberts, Paulo Sérgio Pinheiro, Florentín Meléndez, and Paolo Carozza, members of the Commission. 25