88 b) for Albertina Viana-Lopes, the sum of USD 30,000.00 (thirty thousand United States dollars; c) for Francisco Leopoldino Lopes, the sum of USD 10,000.00 (ten thousand United States dollars; d) for Irene Ximenes-Lopes-Miranda, the sum of USD 25,000.00 (twentyfive thousand United States dollars); and e) for Cosme Ximenes-Lopes, the sum of USD 10,000.00 (ten thousand United States dollars; 239. The compensation awarded to Mr. Damião Ximenes-Lopes shall be delivered pursuant to paragraph 218 hereof, and the compensation awarded to Albertina Viana-Lopes, Irene Ximenes-Lopes-Miranda, Francisco Leopoldino Lopes and Cosme Ximenes-Lopes shall be given to each of them. D) OTHER FORMS OF REPARATION (MEASURES OF SATISFACTION AND GUARANTEES OF NON-REPETITION) 240. In this subparagraph, the Court will determine those measures of satisfaction intended to redress non-pecuniary damage as well as other public or publicly noticeable measures..157 241. For the purpose of a public apology to the next of kin of the victim, the Court values and appreciates the partial acknowledgement of international liability made by the State during the public hearing held on November 30, 2005, in relation to the instant case (supra paras. 36 and 63). At that time, the State stated that: it admits the appropriateness of the Inter-American Commission’s request as regards to the violation of Articles 4 (Right to Life) and 5 (Right to Humane Treatment) of the American Convention. 242. In addition, this Court highlights the fact that on November 3, 2005, the State renamed the Sobral Psychosocial Care Center (CAPS), which was located in the city of Sobral in the context of the creation of the Mental Health Comprehensive Care Network, with the name of “Damião Ximenes-Lopes Psychosocial Care Center. ” Likewise, the State designated the Hall in which the Third Mental Health Conference was held with the name of Damião Ximenes-Lopes. This contributes to raising awareness to avoid the repetition of harmful acts such as those in the instant case and ensure remembrance of the victim.158 243. In addition, the Court recognizes that the State has adopted a series of measures in the domestic jurisdiction aimed at improving the conditions of psychiatric care in the institutions of the Single Health System ( SUS). Some of these measures were adopted by the Municipality of Sobral: it created a commission to 157 Cf. Case of Baldeón-García, supra note 4, para. 193; Case of Sawhoyamaxa Indigenous Community, supra note 4 para. 228; and Case of Pueblo Bello Massacre, supra note25, para. 264. 158 Cf. Case of Gómez Paquiyauri Brothers, supra note 108, para. 236; Case of Myrna Mack Chang, supra note 108, para. 286; and Case of Trujillo Oroza. Reparations (Art. 63(1) Inter-American Convention on Human Rights). Judgment of February 27, 2002. Series C No. 92, para. 122.