90 successful in attaining its purpose within a reasonable time, directly applying in the domestic legal system the protective rules of the American Convention. b) Publication of the Judgment 249. The State must, by way of measure of satisfaction,161 publish once in the Official Gazette and in another nationwide daily newspaper, Chapter VII of this Judgment, which deals with Proven Facts, without the footnotes, and it shall also publish the operative paragraphs hereof. as it has done in previous cases. The publication shall be made within six months as of notice of this Judgment. c) Implementation of Training Programs 250. It has been proved in the instant case that at the time of the events there was no adequate service for treating and hospitalizing persons with mental disabilities, such as in the Casa de Reposo Guararapes (Guararapes Rest Home), an institution that provided such service under the Single Health System. Although the fact that the State has adopted several measures to improve the service is worthy of note, this Court considers that the State must continue developing a training and education program for physicians , psychiatrists, psychologists, nurses, auxiliary nurses, and all other persons working in Mental Health Care institutions, particularly on the principles that must govern the treatment to be afforded to persons who suffer from a mental disability, pursuant to the international guidelines governing the subject and those set forth in this Judgment (supra paras. 130 to 135). * 251. This Judgment is per se a form of reparation and satisfaction for Albertina Viana-Lopes, Irene Ximenes-Lopes-Miranda, Francisco Leopoldina Lopes and Cosme Ximenes-Lopes. E) COSTS AND EXPENSES 252. Court costs and expenses are embodied in the concept of reparation set forth in Article 63(1) of the American Convention. It is the Court’s duty to carefully assess their extent on equitable grounds, taking into account the costs incurred before the domestic and Inter-American courts, and considering the extent to which they have been proved, the circumstances of the specific case and the nature of the international jurisdiction in the protection of human rights.162 253. In this regard, the Court deems it fair to order the State to pay the sum of USD 10,000.00 (ten thousand United States dollars) or the equivalent amount in Brazilian currency, to Albertina Viana-Lopes in order that she can reimburse the costs incurred by the next of kin of Mr. Damião Ximenes-Lopes and pay an amount she deems appropriate to the Center for Global Justice to reimburse the costs incurred by said entity. 161 Cf. Community, 162 Cf. Community, Case supra Case supra of Baldeón-García, supra note 4, para. 194; Case of Sawhoyamaxa Indigenous note 4 para. 236; and Case of Acevedo Jaramillo et al., supra note4, para. 313. of Baldeón-García, supra nota 4, párr. 208; Case of Sawhoyamaxa Indigenous note 4, para. 237; and Case of Acevedo Jaramillo et al., supra note 4, para. 315.