-18the Court may, in its discretion, estimate for the professional services rendered to the [alleged] victims in the instant case [...] before the Inter-American system of protection of Human Rights.” 113. On February 3, 2005, the common intervener filed a statement referring to the brief filed by Peru on January 27, 2006, in which he requested the Court to dismiss the petition for a public hearing made by the State (supra para. 109.) 114. On February 6, 2006, the Inter-American Court issued an Order in which it decided: 1. To dismiss the petition made by the State to hold a second public hearing in the Case Acevedo-Jaramillo et al. 2. To dismiss, on account of its being time-barred, the new argument submitted by Peru in its brief of January 2006, regarding “the evidence that the alleged acknowledgment of responsibility by Peru [before the Commission] is not such. […] V PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS 115. In the brief containing the answer to the application and the comments to the brief of requests and arguments, the State submitted the following preliminary objections: 1. 2. “lack of exhaustion of previous domestic remedies;” and “lack of right to act of the persons signing the complaint.” * * * FIRST PRELIMINARY OBJECTION “failure to exhaust the previous domestic remedies” 116. Arguments by the State: a) this objection is filed “regarding the cause of action in the case of Empresa de Servicios Municipales de Limpieza de Lima (Lima Municipal Cleaning Services Corporation) - ESMLL. This case […] has been improperly or unduly included among the cases to which this proceeding refers and should be excluded therefrom.” In the instant case the domestic remedies have not been exhausted. The domestic case is at the stage where the judgment is being enforced, within the procedures provided for by the domestic legislation regarding appeals for legal protection [enforcement of the constitutional guarantee for protection of civil rights]. The judgment rendered by the Tribunal Constitucional (Constitutional Court) ordered the reinstatement of the applicants who had not collected their social benefits to their jobs, and therefore the issue being discussed at the enforcement phase is the determination of the identity of those who collected such benefits;