-53-
204(9) On March 27, 1996 the Municipality of Lima issued several Mayoral
Resolutions, whereby some workers who are alleged victims of the instant case were
declared redundant on the grounds that they had expressed their intention not to sit
for the assessment.45
204(10) The Municipality of Lima rescheduled the assessments to be carried out
during the first semester of 1996. Said assessment process ended on October 6,
1996,46 and resulted in further dismissals.47
204(11) Many of the workers who had been declared redundant filed appeals for
legal protection [protection of constitutional guarantees and rights] per se or
represented by SITRAMUN, whereby they requested that the above Mayoral
Resolutions of March 27, 1996 providing for their dismissal (supra para. 204(9)) and
Mayoral Resolution No. 033-A-96 (supra para. 204(4))48 be set aside.
204(12) Said appeals for legal protection [protection of constitutional guarantees and
rights] were finally found to be admissible by two judgments rendered by the Sala
Especializada de Derecho Público (Chamber Specializing in Public Law) on February 6
and June 6, 1997 and by two judgments rendered by the Tribunal Constitucional
(Constitutional Court) on April 9 and August 20, 1999,49 which are referred to in the
following paragraphs.
44
Cf. Lima Mayoral Resolutions of March 27, 1996, wherein the dismissal for redundancy was
ordered (case file with appendixes to the application brief, appendixes 16, 18, 19, 20 and 21, folios 237812 and 880- 312).
45
Cf. Lima Mayoral Resolutions No. 463, 397, 448, 398, 428, 380, 506, 381, 508, 429, 466, 430,
431, 467, 432, 433, 469, 382, 509, 426, 384, 472, 402, 473, 449, 474, 450, 511, 435, 383, 560, 512,
477, 401, 478, 480, 481, 482, 436, 462, 495, 515, 390, 484, 440, 486, 516, 564, 488, 552, 517, 490,
405, 427, 389, 518, 519, 520, 492, 451, 493, 521, 453, 494, 522, 495, 409, 523, 454, 501, 562, 502,
408, 503, 525, 455, 392, 504, 386, 567, 552, 461, 442, 528, 418, 529, 443, 533, 534, 536, 422, 537,
538, 393, 540, 444, 555, 445, 542, 543, 544, 546, 559, 411, 556, 547, 548, 557, 561, 413, 550, 415,
468, 505, 424, 470, 510, 385, 475, 403, 446, 459, 404, 460, 438, 489, 491, 439, 496, 500, 526, 457,
532, 535, 558, 554, 387, 419, 479, 412, 414, 507, 465, 434, 471, 400, 399, 423, 513, 485, 437, 406,
407, 498, 499, 391, 527, 441, 396, 456, 530, 531, 388, 539, 541, 447, 420, 395, 458, 421, 417, 545,
563, 416, 448, 398, 511, 436, 523, 501 and 461 of March 27, 1996 (case file with appendixes to the
application brief, appendixes 16, 18, 19, 20 and 21, folios 237-812, 880-1057, 1078-1091, 1100-1263,
and 1280-1312).
46
Cf. Payment receipt and services order of June 28, 1996, issued by the Municipalidad de Lima
(Municipality of Lima) to Universidad San Martín de Porres (San Martín de Porres University) (case file with
appendixes to the brief containing the answer to the application, appendix 14, folio 4180); and judgments
rendered by the ProvisionalSala Corporativa Transitoria Especializada en Derecho Público (Corporate
ProvisionalProvisional Chamber Specializing in Public Law) on September 23, 1998 and on June 23, 1999
(case file with appendixes to the application brief, appendixes 22 and 23, folios 1339 and 1366).
47
Cf. Lima Mayoral Resolutions No. 2339, 2336, 2340, 2341, 2342, 2343, 2344, 2345, 2347, 2346,
2349, 2352, 2353 and 2431 of July 18, 1996 and No. 3143 of October 4, 1996 (case file with appendixes
to the application brief, appendix 16, folios 813-853).
48
Cf. Judgments rendered by the Sala Transitoria Especializada en Derecho Público (Corporate
Chamber Specializing in Public Law)Provisional on February 6 and June 6, 1997 (case file with appendixes
to the application brief, appendixes 17 and 19, folios 861 and 1093); and judgments rendered by the
Tribunal Constitucional (Constitutional Court) on August 20 and April 9, 1999 (case file with appendixes to
the application brief, appendixes 20 and 21, folios 1272 and 1320).
49
Cf. Judgments rendered by the ProvisionalChamber Specializing in Public Law on February 6 and
June 6, 1997 (case file with appendixes to the application brief, appendixes 17 and 19, folios 861 and
1093); and judgments rendered by the Tribunal Constitucional (Constitutional Court) on August 20 and