-68- D.2) Compensation Benefits 204(60) The SITRAMUN filed an appeal for legal protection against the Municipality of Lima, requesting compliance with collective bargaining agreements entered into between 1989 and 1995. On December 13, 1996, the Sexto Juzgado Civil de Lima (Sixth Civil Court of Lima) sustained the complaint, ordering: The Municipalidad de Lima Metropolitana (Municipality of Metropolitan Lima) to comply with the Collective Bargaining Agreements entered into with the Lima Municipal Workers Union - SITRAMUN, from 1989 to 1995, which directly affect wages, allowances, bonuses and other employee benefits, and likewise to pay the workers who are members of that union the amounts due for such items during 1992 through 1995, an average of twenty four thousand, one hundred seventy-six and twenty (24,176.20) nuevos soles for each worker as well as unpaid monthly wages from September through December 1995. 105 204(61) On November 18, 1998, the Sala Corporativa Transitoria Especializada en Derecho Público (Corporate Provisional Chamber Specializing in Public Law) rendered judgment, affirming the decision of the Sexto Juzgado Civil de Lima (Sixth Civil Court of Lima) of Lima entered on December 13, 1996.106 204(62) The Municipality paid part of the outstanding amounts due for October, November and December, 1995107 to some former employees, alleged victims in this case, and paid off the total debt in respect of one of them.108 204(63) On November 17, 2004, the Primer Juzgado Especializado en lo Civil (First Court Specializing in Civil Matters) of the Corte Superior de Justicia de Lima (Supreme Court of Justice of Lima) issued Decision No. 63, declaring that the order of the appeal for legal protection of November 18, 1998 (supra para. 204(61) inures to the benefit “of those workers who were members of the SITRAMUN LIMA at the time the complaint was filed”, and included considerations regarding the procedure to determine which individuals would be entitled to such benefit.109 E) REGARDING TO THE LAND LOCATED IN THE DISTRICT OF LA MOLINA 105 Cf. Judgment rendered by the Sexto Juzgado Civil de Lima (Sixth Civil Court of Lima) on December 13, 1996 (file of appendixes to the application, appendix 36, folio 1802). 106 Cf. Judgment rendered by the Sala Corporativa Transitoria Especializada en Derecho Público (Provisional Corporate Chamber Specializing in Public Law) on November 18, 1998 (file of appendixes to the application, appendix 36). 107 Cf. Statement by witness Juan de Dios Berrospi-Pérez (file of preliminary objections, merits, reparations and costs, Volume V, folios 1517-1522). 108 Cf. Statement by witness Yeni Zully Cubas-Santos (file of preliminary objections, merits, reparations and costs, Volume V, folios 1523-1528). 109 Cf. Order No. 63 rendered on November 17, 2004 by the Primer Juzgado Especializado en lo Civil (First Court Specializing in Civil Matters) of the Corte Superior de Justicia de Lima (Supreme Court of Justice of Lima) (file of appendixes of preliminary objections and possibly merits, reparations and costs, Volume VIII, folio 2657).