-69204(64) On September 22, 1987, the Municipalidad Metropolitana de Lima
(Metropolitan Municipality of Lima) issued Mayoral Resolution No. 1757,110 ordering
the registration “with the Registro de la Propiedad Inmueble de Lima (Land Registry
of Lima), in the name of the Municipalidad de Lima Metropolitana (Municipality of
Metropolitan Lima), of the land, totaling 85,200.00 square meters, […] located in the
area known as Pampa El Arenal, district of La Molina, Province and Department of
Lima […,] and “to award directly and for no consideration to […] SITRAMUN-LIMA the
[aforementioned] land to be used for urban development to the benefit of its
members.” The Resolution further provided that “in the event the beneficiaries of this
award fail to comply with the provisions set forth in Article 24 of Executive Order No.
004-85-VC as grounds for lapsing or termination, the land shall revert to the
Municipality of Lima, without any compensation therefore.” Said award was
registered with the Registros Públicos de Lima (Public Registries of Lima) under entry
no. 2-C, Record No. 257334.111
204(65) On April 28, 1993, the Municipality of Lima issued Mayoral Resolution No.
399, granting a three-year extension for the completion by the SITRAMUN of the
relevant processes and of the urban development of the land awarded to the
union.112
204(66) On December 28, 1995, Resolution No. 265-95 was issued and published in
the Official Gazette ““El Peruano”” of February 16, 1996. By means of this resolution,
the Urban Development Director of the Municipality of Lima authorized the
SITRAMUN “to complete in a period […] not exceeding 24 months [,] following notice
of the […] Resolution, the Urban Development works, the projects of which are
cleared” in the same resolution.113
204(67) On January 16, 1998, the Municipality of Lima issued Resolution No. 267,114
declaring the award of the land located in the district of La Molina to have lapsed, for
failure to complete the urban development works within the stipulated term, and
ordering cancellation of the registration with the Land Registry. In said Resolution, it
was further resolved that the land would remain reserved “for the implementation of
a Municipal Housing Program for municipal workers providing sufficient proof of being
110
Cf. Lima Mayoral Resolution No. 1757 of September 22, 1987 (file of appendixes to the closing
argument brief of the common intervener, appendix 86, folio 6038).
111
Cf. Notarial deeds of accord and satisfaction and sale and purchase of land executed by the
SITRAMUN on April 11, 1998 and July 20, 1998 (file of appendixes to the answer to the application,
appendixes 52 and 53, folios 4395 and 4407).
112
Cf. Lima Mayoral Resolution No. 399 of April 28, 1993 (file of appendixes to the submission of
comments by the common intervener submitted on January 4, 2006, Appendix 3(2), folio 6714); Lima
Mayoral Resolution No. 822 of March 2, 1999 (file of appendixes to the submission of closing arguments
by the common intervener, appendix 101, folio 6091); and Lima Mayoral Resolution No. 267 of January
16, 1998 (file of appendixes to the application, appendix 38, folio 1869).
113
Cf. Resolution No. 265-95-MLM/SMDU-DMDU issued by the Directora Municipal de Desarrollo
Urbano (Urban Development Municipal Director) of the Municipalidad de Lima (Municipality of Lima) on
December 28, 1995 (file of appendixes to the submission of closing arguments by the common intervener,
appendix 90, folios 6046 to 6050); and Judgment rendered by the Sala Corporativa Transitoria
Especializada en Derecho Público (Provisional Corporate Chamber Specializing in Public Law) rendered on
August 19, 1999 (file of appendixes to the application, appendix 38, folio 1880).
114
Cf. Mayoral Resolution No. 267 of January 16, 1998 (file of appendixes to the application,
appendix 38, folio 1869).