11 53. The report prepared by the investigating medical examiner of the Public Prosecution Service indicates that they arrived at the scene of the crime at 6:30 a.m. and that the corpse was examined at 8:10 a.m. The report also notes that the corpse was covered with a white sheet. In addition, the clothes were stained with blood, the brassiere and belt had been removed, and the blouse was on inside-out 14 GENERAL DATA: DATE: 13/08/05. TIME OF ARRIVAL AT THE SCENE: 6:30 a.m., OF CORPSE EXAMINATION: 8:10 a.m. […] MEDICO-LEGAL HISTORY: History of having been found dead at approximately 5:00 a.m. POSITION OF THE CORPSE: Face up. PRIOR MANIPULATION: Yes Examination of scene and surrounding area: Cadaver [lying] on the asphalt covered with a white sheet with a cartridge case and blood around it, underneath the corpse [there was] a condom wrapper and [there was] a strong smell of alcohol. EXTERNAL EXAMINATION OF THE CORPSE: Clothes: Bloodstained. Brassiere removed, belt removed, zipper lowered, blouse on inside-out. […] CONCLUSIONS: ESTIMATED TIME OF DEATH: 1-3 hours. PROBABLE MANNER OF DEATH: Homicide LABORATORY TESTS REQUESTED: Blood alcohol and drug test Rectal and vaginal swabs, and scraping of fingernails. 54. Subsequently, on June 21, 2006, the Medical Examiner from the Public Prosecution Service who carried out the external inspection said that the correct time of the examination of the cadaver was 6:55 a.m., not 8:10 a.m., as he had stated in the earlier report.15 55. The report of the criminalistic investigators from the Public Prosecution Service also said that the clothes “worn by the unidentified female” were inside out and she was not wearing a brassiere: “It should be noted that the blouse was on inside out and she was not wearing the brassiere.”16 According to an investigation report, Mynor Norberto García, an agent of the National Civil Police who arrived at the scene of the crime, said that the brassiere was covered in blood and the alleged victim was not wearing it; rather it was around her trousers, which led him to assume that she had been raped.17 In that connection, the same investigation report documented the interview with Santiago Haz, another policeman, who also said that he presumed that a rape could have been committed because 14 Appendix 8. Report DMF-2947-05 ESCENA 2413-05 PAC/lm of August 30, 2005, prepared by Mr. Pedro Adolfo Ciani, Investigating Medical Examiner, Public Prosecution Service. Enclosed with the original petition of December 10, 2007. 15 Appendix 9. Report, unnumbered, of June 21, 2006, signed by Dr. Pedro Adolfo Ciani, Medical Examiner of the Public Prosecution Service. Enclosed with the original petition of December 10, 2007. 16 Appendix 10, Report of Public Prosecution Service criminalistic investigations technicians Walter Adolfo Morales Rosales and Sergio Antonio Polanco Rivera, RAC 3,970-2005 of August 19, 2005. Copy of judicial record presented by the petitioners on May 31, 2012. 17 Appendix 11. Report by investigators Jose Antonio Anaya and Dairyn Antonieta López, RAC. 2005-4813 of October 24, 2005, addressed to Celeste Díaz García, Government Prosecutor, Unit No. 14. Copy of judicial record presented by the petitioners on May 31, 2012.