3 g) to Norma Iveth Sánchez Argueta, US$20,000.00 (twenty thousand United States dollars) or their equivalent in Honduran currency, under the terms set forth in paragraphs 177, 196 to 199 of the [...] Judgment. h) to each of the following: Reina Isabel Sánchez, María Milagro Sánchez, Rosa Delia Sánchez, Domitila Vijil Sánchez, María Florinda Vijil Sánchez, Juan Carlos Vijil Sánchez, Celio Vijil Sánchez and Julio Sánchez, US$5,000.00 (five thousand United States dollars) or their equivalent in Honduran currency, under the terms set forth in paragraphs 177, 196 to 198 of the [...] Judgment. 10. the State [was to] continue to effectively investigate the facts in the [...] case under the terms set forth in paragraph 186 of the [...] Judgment, to identify those responsible, both the direct perpetrators and the instigators, as well as possible accessories after the fact, and to punish them administratively and criminally as appropriate; the next of kin of the victim [were to] have full access and capacity to act, at all stages and levels of said investigations, in accordance with domestic laws and the provisions of the American Convention on Human Rights; and the results of said investigations [were to] be made known to the public. 11. the State [was to] provide the conditions required to transfer the mortal remains of Juan Humberto Sánchez to the place chosen by his next of kin, at no cost to them, as set forth in paragraph 187 of the [...] Judgment. 12. the State was to] implement a record of detainees that enables control of legality of detentions, under the terms set forth in paragraph 189 of the [...] Judgment. 13. the State [was to] publicly acknowledge its responsibility regarding the facts in this case, and as amends to the victims it [was to] publish in the official gazette and in another national-circulation daily, once only, the operative part of this Judgment and the chapter pertaining to proven facts in this Judgment, under the terms set forth in paragraph 188 of the [...] Judgment. 14. the State [was to] pay the total sum of US$19,000.00 (nineteen thousand United States dollars) or their equivalent in Honduran currency for legal costs and expenses, under the terms set forth in paragraphs 194, 195, 196 to 198 of the [...] Judgment. 15. compensation for pecuniary damage, non pecuniary damage, and legal costs and expenses established in the [...] Judgment [was] not […] subject to currently existing or future taxes, levies or charges. 16. the State [was to] comply with the measures of reparation ordered in the [...] Judgment within six months of the date it [was] notified. 17. if the State [was] in arrears, it [was to] pay interest on the amount owed, which [would] be the banking interest for arrears in Honduras. 18. the compensation ordered in favor of the girls, Breidy Maybeli Sánchez and Norma Iveth Sánchez, [was to] be deposited by the State in their name in an investment at a solid Honduran banking institution, in United States dollars or their equivalent in Honduran currency, within six months time, and under the most favorable financial conditions allowed by banking practice and legislation, as set forth in paragraph 199 of [the] Judgment. 19. it [would] monitor compliance with [the] judgment and [would] close the [...] case once the State ha[d] fully applied the provisions of the [...] judgment. Within six months of the date when [the] Judgment [was] notified, the State [was to] submit to the Court a report on the measures adopted to comply with this Judgment, as set forth in paragraph 200 of [the] Judgment. 2. The interpretation of the Judgment on preliminary objections, merits and reparations, which the Court delivered on November 26, 2003 and in which it decided: