4 1. To reject as inadmissible the appeal for review of the judgment of June 7, 2003, filed by the State in the Juan Humberto Sánchez case. 2. To reject in toto as without grounds the State’s call for interpretation of the judgment of June 7, 2003, in the Juan Humberto Sánchez case, contained in the request. 3. To continue monitoring compliance with the judgment of June 7, 2003, as established in paragraphs 196 to 200 of this judgment. 3. The July 9, 2003 note CDH-11.073/148 wherein the Secretariat of the Court (hereinafter “the Secretariat”), pursuant to Article 57(1) of the Court’s Rules of Procedure (hereinafter “the Rules of Court”), notified the State of Honduras (hereinafter “the State” or “Honduras”) of the Judgment the Court delivered on June 7, 2003 (supra Having Seen 1). 4. Note CDH-11.073/163 of March 11, 2004, in which the Secretariat requested that the State send its report on compliance with the judgment in the case as soon as possible, since the deadline for presenting the report was January 9, 2004. 5. Note CDH-11.073/167 of June 1, 2004, in which the Secretariat repeated the request it made in its note of March 11, 2004 (supra Having Seen 4) to the effect that the State had to present, as soon as possible, its report on compliance with the Judgment delivered in this case. 6. The State’s June 17, 2004 brief wherein it informed the Court that it “ha[d] already started coordinating for complying with [the] judgment, having already contacted the representatives of the petitioners to inform them of the progress made on compliance with the judgment.” 7. The Secretariat’s note CDH-11.073/172, dated June 21, 2004, where, following instructions from the President of the Court (hereinafter “the President���) it informed the State that it was still awaiting the State’s first report on compliance with the judgment. It therefore asked the State to send that report as soon as possible. 8. The August 19, 2004 communication and attachments wherein the Center for Justice and International Law (CEJIL) and the Committee of Relatives of DetaineesDisappeared in Honduras (COFADEH), as representatives of the victim’s next of kin (hereinafter “the representatives) reported on “the steps taken thus far to secure compliance” with the judgment delivered in the present case. The representatives emphasized that August 27, 2004 had been set as a possible date for the exhumation of the victim’s mortal remains, pursuant to operative paragraph 11 of the Judgment of June 7, 2003 (supra Having Seen 1). 9. Note CDH-11.073/177 of August 23, 2004, whereby the Secretariat, following the President’s instructions, reminded the State that the Court was still waiting for the State’s first report on compliance with the Judgment. The Secretariat therefore requested that the report be sent forthwith.