96 fourth operative paragraph of the judgment on merits delivered by the Court on April 29, 2004 (supra para. 18), and also Chapter VII entitled Proven Facts (without the footnotes), and the first to ninth operative paragraph of this judgment, within one year of notification of this judgment. e) Guarantee of non-repetition by providing resources for the collective memory 104. With regard to the guarantees of non-repetition of the facts of this case, the Court establishes, in fairness, the sum of US$25,000.00 (twenty-five thousand United States dollars) or its equivalent in national currency, for maintenance and improvements to the infrastructure of the chapel in which the victims pay homage to those who were executed in the Plan de Sánchez massacre. Within one year of notification of this judgment, this sum must be delivered to the members of the Plan de Sánchez community or their chosen representatives, who will be responsible for administering it. This will help raise public awareness to avoid repetition of events such as those that occurred in this case, and keep alive the memory of those who died.271 g) Housing program 105. Since the inhabitants of Plan de Sánchez lost their homes as a result of the facts of this case (supra para. 49(4)), the Court considers that the State must implement a housing program to provide adequate housing272 to the surviving victims who live in that village (supra paras. 66(a) and 68(a)) and who require it. The State must implement this program within five years of notification of this judgment. f) Medical and psychological treatment 106. The victims who have given testimony before the Court or by affidavit have stated that they suffer from physical and psychological problems as a result of the facts of this case. Also, the expert witness, Nieves Gómez Dupuis, stated during the public hearing that the surviving victims of the massacre have mental health problems and psychosomatic ailments. The Court notes that it should order a measure designed to reduce the physical and mental sufferings of the victims in this case (supra para. 49(10)), resulting from the violations, if they so wish.273 107. To help repair this damage, the Court decides that the State shall provide, free of charge, through its specialized health institutions, the medical treatment that the victims require, including, inter alia, any necessary medication. The State shall also create a specialized program of psychological and psychiatric treatment, which should also be provided free of charge. When providing the psychological and psychiatric treatment, the special circumstances and needs of each person must be taken into account, in order to provide collective, family and individual treatment. 271 Cf. Case of the Gómez Paquiyauri Brothers, supra note 251, para. 236; Case of the 19 Tradesmen, supra note 254, para.273, and Case of Molina Theissen. Reparations, supra note 256, para. 88. 272 Cf. Application of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General Comment 4, The right to adequate housing (paragraph 1 of Article 11 of the Covenant) (Sixth session, 1991), U.N. Doc. E/1991/23. 273 Cf. Case of the “Juvenile Reeducation Institute”, supra note 3, para. 318; Case of the Gómez Paquiyauri Brothers, supra note 251, para. 207, and Case of the 19 Tradesmen, supra note 254, para. 277.