21 also decided to impound the vehicle in which Eduardo José was transferred in the parking lot of the 104 CTPJ’s Mariño office. 98. A visual inspection of the body of Eduardo José Landaeta Mejías was carried out at around noon and an autopsy was performed, in the course of which three projectiles were removed from 105 his corpse and turned over to the police. It was also ordered that these projectiles be deposited in the 106 Recovered Objects Room. 107 99. That same day, CSOP police officers Carlos Alexander Rojas and Carlos Andrés 108 Requena CSOP appeared at the CTPJ and reiterated the version contained in the police report regarding the interception of the vehicle in which they were transferring Eduardo José Landaeta Mejías by persons with their faces covered, the disarming of the officers, the shots fired at Eduardo José 109 Landaeta Mejiás, and the wounding of officer Freddy Antonio Blanco. It was also decided to summon 110 officer Freddy Antonio Blanco Pérez. 100. It should also be mentioned that at the time of the death of Eduardo José Landaeta Mejías, officers Carlos Alexander Rojas, Carlos Andrés Requena, and Freddy Blanco Pérez, were serving 111 as constables of the General Command of the Public Order and Security Corps. Procedures carried out in 1997 101. On January 1, 1997, the CTPJ decided to send a memorandum to the Criminalistics Laboratory requesting a legal examination and hematology test on a piece of gauze recovered at the 112 scene that was impregnated with a reddish-brown substance. 102. On January 2, 1997, the CTPJ decided to send a memorandum to the Criminalistics 113 Laboratory requesting that it carry out a “special activation” on the red Fiat car, license plate DAF-91Z. 103. On January 3, 1997, the CTPJ decided to: i) send a memorandum to the Fingerprint Department requesting the fingerprints of the corpse of Eduardo José Landaeta Mejías, in order to 114 determine his true identity; ii) send a memorandum to the Criminalistics Laboratory requesting that it 104 Appendix 9. Exhibit 1. Domestic proceeding. Case 4C-4822/04, pages 58 and 59. (Appendix 2 to the petitioners’ brief with observations on merits of July 18, 2007). 105 Appendix 9. Exhibit 1. Domestic proceeding. Case 4C-4822/04, page 61 (Appendix 2 to the petitioners’ brief with observations on merits of July 18, 2007). 106 Appendix 9. Exhibit 1. Domestic proceeding. Case 4C-4822/04, page 62 (Appendix 2 to the petitioners’ brief with observations on merits of July 18, 2007). 107 Appendix 25. Statement of Carlos Alexander Rojas Alvarado to the Judicial Police Technical Corps, December 31, 1996. (Appendix 2 to the initial petition received on April 24, 2006). 108 Appendix 26. Statement of Carlos Andrés Requena Mendoza to the Judicial Police Technical Corps, December 31, 1996 and (Appendix 2 to the initial petition received on April 24, 2006). 109 Appendixes 25 and 26. Statements of Carlos Alexander Rojas Alvarado and Carlos Andrés Requena Mendoza to the Judicial Police Technical Corps, December 31, 1996 (Appendix 2 to the initial petition received on April 24, 2006). 110 Appendix 9. Exhibit 1. Domestic proceeding. Case 4C-4822/04, page 67 (Appendix 2 to the petitioners’ brief with observations on merits of July 18, 2007). 111 Appendix 9. Exhibit 1. Domestic proceeding. Case 4C-4822/04, pages 9, 10, and 13 (Appendix 2 to the petitioners’ brief with observations on merits of July 18, 2007). 112 Appendix 9. Exhibit 1. Domestic proceeding. Case 4C-4822/04, pages 69 and 70 (Appendix 2 to the petitioners’ brief with observations on merits of July 18, 2007). 113 Appendix 9. Exhibit 1. Domestic proceeding. Case 4C-4822/04, pages 71 and 72 (Appendix 2 to the petitioners’ brief with observations on merits of July 18, 2007). 114 Appendix 9. Exhibit 1. Domestic proceeding. Case 4C-4822/04, pages 73 and 74 (Appendix 2 to the petitioners’ brief with observations on merits of July 18, 2007).