2 4. Request the State to make all the pertinent approaches so that the protection measures are planned and implemented with the participation of the representatives of the beneficiaries and that, in general, they are informed regarding to the progress of their implementation. 5. Request the State to forward the Court an updated list of all the young inmates institutionalized in Tatuapé Complex and to precisely state: a) information regarding the minor’s identity; b) date and time of entrance, eventual transfer and liberation, and c) if the prosecuted adolescents and those whose legal status has already been solved by the Judicial Power are physically located in different sections within the Complex. 6. Request the State to investigate the facts which give raise to the adoption of provisional measures, in order to identify the responsible parties and impose the corresponding sanctions, including those administrative and disciplinary. 7. Request the State to inform the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, no later than January 6, 2006, the results of the meeting that shall take place between the parties on December 15, 2005 in the city of São Paulo [,,,], and also the measures adopted to fulfill with what has been ordered by the Court, and request the representatives of the beneficiaries and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights that they submit their observations regarding the above mentioned report within the term of four and six weeks, respectively, as from the notice of the reports of the State. 8. Request the State to, subsequent to the report mentioned in the precedent operative paragraph, keep informing the Inter-American Court of Human Rights on the provisional measures adopted, every two months, and request the representatives of the beneficiaries of the measures and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights that they present their observations within the term of four and six weeks, respectively, as from the notice of the reports of the State. […] 3. The submission presented by the representatives of the beneficiaries of the provisional measures (hereinafter “the representatives”) of December 16, 2005, whereby they requested the inclusion as “co-applicants” of the following NGOs in this case: Associação de Mães e Amigos da Crinça e do Adolescente em Risco (AMAR), Associação Conectas Direitos Humanos (CONECTAS), Fundação Projeto Travessia (TRAVESSIA) and Fundação Interamericana de Defesa dos Direitos Humanos (FIDDH). 4. The writ submitted by the representatives of December 22, 2005, whereby they informed the Court on the results of the meeting held between the parties on December 16, 2005 in the city of São Paulo. In this respect, the representatives said that in this meeting, the proposal of the Federal Government and the Inter-American Commission consisted in the formation of a follow-up team, limited to two organizations representing the beneficiaries and two representatives of the government of the State of São Paulo. However, the representatives rejected the proposal as they considered that the team did not have the necessary technical qualifications to reach its final aim and, furthermore, it excluded other representatives organizations. 5. The first State report of January 6, 2006 and its Appendixes, by means of which, inter alia and after the concession of a postponement, it mentioned that: a) regarding to operative paragraph No. one, with the security reinforcement since June 2005 and the return to the pedagogic activities at Tatuapé Complex, episodes of disturbance and escapes have considerably