24 the rate in effect on the international market. The total amount was then distributed among the victims as stipulated in the previous paragraph. 93. The calculations made resulted in the following: Daison Aloeboetoe Deede-Manoe Aloeboetoe Mikuwendje Aloeboetoe Richenel Voola Indie Hendrik Banai Bernard Tiopo Asipee Adame US$ 29,070.29,070.29,070.38,755.29,070.29,070.29,070.- 94. The expenses incurred by the families as a result of the disappearance of the victims were calculated on the basis of the sums claimed by the Commission, except in the case of the brothers Daison and Deede-Manoe Aloeboetoe, for the reasons explained above. In order to determine the current value of these expenses, the same procedure used to calculate the reparations for moral damages was applied. 95. The results of these calculations are as follows: Daison Aloeboetoe Deede-Manoe Aloeboetoe Mikuwendje Aloeboetoe Richenel Voola Indie Hendrik Banai Bernard Tiopo Asipee Adame US$ 1,030.1,030.242.1,575.1,453.1,453.726.- 96. The compensation fixed for the victims’ heirs includes an amount that will enable the minor children to continue their education until they reach a certain age. Nevertheless, these goals will not be met merely by granting compensatory damages; it is also essential that the children be offered a school where they can receive adequate education and basic medical attention. At the present time, this is not available in several of the Saramaka villages. Most of the children of the victims live in Gujaba, where the school and the medical dispensary have both been shut down. The Court believes that, as part of the compensation due, Suriname is under the obligation to reopen the school at Gujaba and staff it with teaching and administrative personnel to enable it to function on a permanent basis as of 1994. In addition, the necessary steps shall be taken for the medical dispensary already in place there to be made operational and reopen that same year. XV 97. As regards the distribution of the amounts fixed for the various types of compensation, the Court considers that it would be fair to apply the following criteria: a. Of the reparations for material damages caused to each victim, one third is assigned to their wives. If there is more than one wife, this amount shall be divided among them in equal parts. Two thirds shall go to the