2 be ascertained nor responsibility be pinned on the State agents, without seeking the maximum in the quest for justice “in that as time passes the truth passes.” 5. The State of Mexico should ensure that legal uncertainty no longer occurs, that which affects governed individuals when crimes are investigated of one and of another application of the law within the constitutional jurisdiction, namely, that investigative procedures be undertaken without a definite juridical criteria derived from a factual relation, such as when soldiers are criminally charged, then it becomes less coherent when an investigations is then carried out in the common jurisdiction, leaving the victims defenseless because of the lack of a legal remedies to strengthen their defense and to guarantee access to justice for them. 6. It must be noted, that however negligence and lack of results in procuring justice from the Mexican State were duly proven within the different criminal constitutional jurisdictions that were involved in the investigation of the facts, even with those acting as assistant to the public prosecutor, it shall also be said, that this is not a systematic violation used by the Mexican State as an instrument to intentionally frighten the indigenous communities in the region, particularly in regards to women. 7. The application, setting the litigious framework of the proceeding, does not exclude the possibility of presenting supervening evidence before a judgment is pronounced, those of which must be distinguished, in a timely matter, from the facts that are not grounds of the litis, even if they are related to the case, therefore the complaint, or the initial written document, sets the beginning of the litis. 8. The attention given by the Mexican State to the Judgment, shall not only emphasize the State’s obligation to provide first level psychological care to the victim, namely, care given by experts on the field to all direct and indirect victims, but it also shall supervise that such treatments are indeed carried out until the victims are medically discharged. 9. Resulting from retrospective and prospective studies, the Mexican State must redesign and strengthen public policies that involve its Armed Forces in order to minimize interaction between military soldiers and the civil population, thereby ensuring not only a decrease in inconveniences caused, but also a decrease in violations to fundamental rights for greater offenses to the civil population, while disciplinary forces carry out their tasks and that have been emphasized due to public safety issues in Mexico; consequently, indoctrination should be given to military soldiers who provisionally carry out tasks of public safety or tasks which are linked to it or to the investigation and persecution of the crimes in which they participate. 10. With the current paradigmatic case, the Mexican State should seize the opportunity, not only to restore its commitment to civil society, but also to simultaneously, execute proper compliance to the Judgment handed down in this case, as well as in the case of Rosendo Cantu et. al.; it is now time to start a review and transformation of a lagging military model of justice, not only pertaining to the legislative methodology, but also to the distribution of its courts and tribunals and its substantive and procedural rules, thus considering adopting a new model which will not play down the importance of service, obedience, and discipline, but yet will allow for the transformation of the Mexican military judicial system. 11. With ad cautelam, the importance and significance for the State of Mexico of, in a preventive sense, taking its military tribunals to the Judicial branch of the Federation, should be considered because if it is true that irregularities were involved in the criminal proceedings of the preliminary investigation of this case, it