8 las Iglesias Cristianas (FASIC) on behalf of the aforementioned Chilean citizens; and second, to process this application when the original petition was lodged without establishing the exhaustion of the domestic remedies of Peru. Third Objection lack of a prior demand and of the exhaustion of the domestic remedies of Peru [with respect to] the alleged violation [of Article 29 of the Convention in relation to] the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations. Fourth Objection lack of a prior demand and of the exhaustion of the domestic remedies of Peru with respect to the claim made in point six of the brief supporting the application, under which the Court is to order the Peruvian State to immediately release and compensate Jaime Francisco CastilloPetruzzi, María Concepción Pincheira-Sáez, Lautaro Enrique Mellado-Saavedra, and Alejandro Astorga-Valdéz. Fifth Objection lack of status as a legal entity of the party that, in the name of the Fundación de Ayuda Social de las Iglesias Cristianas (FASIC), filed petition No. 11,319 with the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights against the Peruvian State and lack of standing of the aforementioned foundation. Sixth Objection lack of standing of the Fundación de Ayuda Social de las Iglesias Cristianas (FASIC) and of those who the Commission referred in points thirteen and fourteen of the application as "another group of complainants" or "a second group of petitioners" [and sovereignty]. Seventh Objection premature decision of the Honorable Commission to send the present case to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Eighth Objection Ambiguity in the manner of submitting the application. Ninth Objection Lapse of the application. Tenth Objection Disregard of the principles of sovereignty and jurisdiction. As to the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, and eighth objections, the State requests that the Court admit them or reserve its decision until the judgment on the merits of the case. As to the seventh, ninth, and tenth objections, it requests that they be admitted and that the application be dismissed. 28. On October 6, 1997, the Commission presented a communication to the Court, to which it added a "list of corrections made [...] to the application" of July