12 date on which the term for the compliance with this obligation expired, in the terms of paragraph 338 of the Judgment.7 46. That, similarly, there is still a discrepancy in the way in which the amounts corresponding to the compensations ordered in the Judgment shall be paid. In this regard, the Court warns that regardless of the mechanism through which the expenditures are made, the State shall guarantee that it does not imply any expense for the victims or their next of kin. 47. That regarding the reimbursement of the amounts of US$ 5,000.00 (five thousand dollars of the United States of America) to the Tekojojá Foundation and of US$ 12,500.00 (twelve thousand five hundred dollars of the United States of America) to the Center for Justice and International Law for the concept of expenses and costs (eighteenth operative paragraph of the Judgment), the State has not provided updated information on its state of compliance. 48. That, based on the preceding considerations, the Court considers it necessary that the State: a) present information on the proceedings used for the full payment of the compensations, especially in what refers to the accessibility and gratuity of the process for judicial payment; b) continue forwarding in its reports the updated list of the payments made along with the complete identification data of the beneficiaries that received them, and c) forward the relevant documents regarding payment of the remaining balance foreseen for 2010, including the information that refers to the mentioned interests on loan arrears (supra Considering Clause number 45). The State is asked to forward information on the monetary amounts expressed in dollars of the United States of America. THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, by virtue of its authority to monitor compliance with its own decisions pursuant to Articles 33, 62(1), 62(3), 65, 67 and 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, Articles 25(1) and 30 of its Statute, and Articles 30 and 63 of its Rules of Procedure,8 DECLARES: 1. That the State has partially complied with its obligation stated in the following operative paragraphs of the Judgment: 7 Cf. Case of the “Juvenile Reeducation Institute” v. Paraguay. Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations, and Costs. Judgment of September 2, 2004. Series C No. 112, para. 338. 8 Rules of Procedure approved by the Court in its XLIX Regular Session held from November 16 through 25, 2000 and partially reformed during the LXXXII Regular Session, held from January 19 through 31, 2009.