6 c) The official exchange rate of the United States dollar to the Peruvian currency, for the period from 1990 to 1998, issued by the Central Bank of Peru; d) Peruvian legislation on the two annual job bonuses, which become a thirteenth monthly salary; e) Peruvian legislation exempting petitions of habeas corpus and criminal proceedings from payment of court fees; f) Law No. 26.926, of January 30, 1998, enacted on February 21, 1998, typifying genocide, forced disappearance and torture as crimes against humanity, even though there were precedents in the criminal code, and g) Decree-Law No. 25.592, published July 2, 1992, which typifies the crime of forced disappearance. In the same notes sent to the State, just as in an earlier note dated August 26, 1998, the Court reiterated the request it had made Peru on March 11, 1998, that it send the [r]eport prepared by the Office of the Inspector General of Police on the operation in which Ernesto Rafael Castillo-Páez was detained on orders from the Ministry of the Interior, as mentioned in official memorandum 2558/DMC-CA, and any other available intelligence relative to the circumstances of the disappearance of Ernesto Rafael CastilloPáez. 20. On July 27, 1998, the State requested another hearing to "elaborate upon the observations made […] on the [r]eparations requested." On July 30, 1998, the Secretariat advised Peru that the President considered its request inadmissible. 21. On August 21 and 24, September 9, 11, 29 and 30, October 1, 9, 26 and 29, and November 2 and 11, all in 1998, the State forwarded some of the documents the Court had requested as additional, helpful evidence (infra 32). By notes dated August 20 and 28, 1998, the victim’s next of kin submitted some of the documents the Court had requested as helpful evidence for purposes of arriving at a more informed judgment (infra 28). The Inter-American Commission, for its part, did not respond to the Court’s request for evidence. 22. On September 11, 1998, the State filed a brief with observations on the assessments made by the victim’s next of kin, wherein it reserved its right to express its view on the English-language publication of "Human Rights Watch/Americas/Helsinki" (HRW), submitted by the victim’s next of kin in their brief of August 20, 1998, until such time as a Spanish translation of that publication was made available to it. The State attached the following documents to its brief: a November 6, 1990 letter that the then Dean of the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Peru, Mr. Hugo Saravia-Swett, sent to the Minister of the Interior wherein reference was made to the disappearance of student Ernesto Rafael Castillo-Páez, and press clippings on bankruptcy proceedings that had occurred in Peru. On October 2, 1998, the victim’s next of kin supplied a Spanish translation of the publication of "Human Rights Watch/Americas/Helsinki," which the Secretariat then forwarded to the State on October 5, 1998.