conflict, constitute a clear message that the risk can materialize under the precautionary measures.” 4. The request of the Commission for the Court, based on Article 63(2) of the American Convention and Article 27 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court, to require that the State: a) “[a]dopt immediate measures to individually protect Mr. Danilo Rueda, without territorial limitations, pursuant to the requirements of the beneficiary in order to avoid the materialization of death threats against him and ensure the continuity of his work as an advocate for human rights"; b) “[e]stablish a quick and effective mechanism for assessing the risk faced by Mr. Danilo Rueda, that allows for qualitatively identifying the current sources of risk and, consequently, taking the appropriate protective measures against them"; c) “[a]dopt other measures, in consultation with [Mr. Danilo Rueda], that allow for the public destigmatization stemming from the highest levels of government of Mr. Danilo Rueda’s work as a human rights defender and as Director of the CIJP,” and d) “[c]ome to an agreement with [Mr. Danilo Rueda] of the implementation of provisional measures.” 5. The Commission’s request to the “President in office of the [...] Court who holds the power to order, exceptionally, urgent measures established in Article 2[7].6 of the Rules of Procedure” to protect the life and personal integrity of Mr. Danilo Rueda,” in order to, pursuant to such Rules of Procedure, ensure the effectiveness of the provisional measures that the Court will eventually ratify.” 6. The Secretariat's note of April 25, 2014, whereby, pursuant to the instructions of the Standing President of the Court in this case, requested that the State, in a nonextendable deadline of May 2, 2014, submit the observations it deemed relevant to the request for provisional measures filed on April 23, 2014 (supra Having Seen clause 1), as well as any additional information it considers relevant to Mr. Danilo Rueda’s situation. Furthermore, the Secretariat's note of April 28, 2014, by which, given the information provided by the Commission in a brief of April 26, 2014 (supra Having Seen clause 1), following the instructions of the Standing President of the Court, requested that the State, in a non-extendable deadline of April 30, 2014, submit any observations it deemed relevant to that brief, as well as on the brief submitted on April 23, 2014. 7. The brief of the State of May 2, 2014, wherein the State provided its observations to the brief filed by the Inter-American Commission and noted that: a) “efforts have been made to safeguard the right to life and personal integrity of the beneficiaries of the precautionary measures adopted by the Commission, which include Mr. Danilo Rueda, through a process of negotiation in which the petitioners, the beneficiaries, and competent authorities have participated.” According to the State, throughout the various occasions in which the precautionary measures were discussed, “although there has been a request to strengthen the measures of protection, the beneficiary organization has not expressed a need for individualized protection schemes.” However, “the State 6