129 (b) Marco Aurelio Areiza Osorio and Elvia Rosa Areiza Barrera, as victims of the violation of the right to humane treatment established in Article 5(1) (Right to Humane Treatment) of the Convention, in relation to Article 1(1) (Obligation to Respect Rights) thereof; (c) Jairo de Jesús Sepúlveda Arias, Marco Aurelio Areiza Osorio and Elvia Rosa Areiza Barrera, as victims of the violation of the right to personal liberty enshrined in Article 7(1) (Right to Personal Liberty) of the Convention, in relation to Article 1(1) (Obligation to Respect Rights) thereof, and regarding whom the Court also determined the violation of their right to humane treatment established in Article 5(1) of the Convention, in relation to Article 1(1) (Obligation to Respect Rights) thereof (supra para. 269); and (d) Bernardo María Jiménez Lópera, Francisco Osvaldo Pino Posada, Libardo Mendoza, Luis Humberto Mendoza, Omar Alfredo Torres Jaramillo and Ricardo Alfredo Builes Echeverry, as victims of the violation of the right to property embodied in Article 21(1) (Freedom of Movement and Residence) of the Convention, in relation to Article 1(1) (Obligation to Respect Rights) thereof, and regarding whom the Court also determined the violation of their right to humane treatment established in Article 5(1) of the Convention, in relation to Article 1(1) (Obligation to Respect Rights) thereof (supra para. 270). 356. Furthermore, the Court considers that the immediate next of kin of the 19 victims executed are also injured parties as victims of the violation of the rights embodied in Articles 5(1) (Right to Humane Treatment) (supra para. 265), 8 (Right to a Fair Trial) and 25 (Right to Judicial Protection) of the American Convention (supra para. 344), in relation to Article 1(1) (Obligation to Respect Rights) thereof. Their relationship has been determined by a document issued by the competent authority proving this, such as a birth certificate or a baptismal certificate, death certificate or identity card, or by acknowledgement of this relationship in the domestic proceedings.262 357. The next of kin of the victims are beneficiaries of the reparations established by the Court for non-pecuniary and/or pecuniary damage as victims of the violations of the Convention that have been declared, and also of the reparations established by the Court as successors of the 19 victims deprived of their life.263 358. Regarding the immediate next of kin, concerning whom no official documentation has been submitted or the documentation submitted does not confirm the relationship, the Court establishes that the compensation that corresponds to them for the non-pecuniary damage suffered will conform to the parameters established for the next of kin of the victims who have been duly identified (supra para. 356 and 357 and infra para. 359), provided they submit the official information 262 Cf. Case of the Pueblo Bello Massacre, supra note 9, para. 237; Case of the “Mapiripán Massacre”, supra note 8, para. 257; and Case of the Moiwana Community, supra note 12, para. 178. 263 Cf. Case of the Pueblo Bello Massacre, supra note 9, para. 236.