40 an amount of money in equity,96 taking into consideration that international case law has repeatedly held that the judgment is in and of itself a form of redress.97 204. Consequently, the Court deems it appropriate to set in equity the sum of US$ 100,000.00 (a hundred thousand United States dollars) as compensation for the nonpecuniary damages caused to Mr. Bueno-Alves as a result of the violations of his human rights as determined in this Judgment. 205. As for Tomasa Alves-De Lima, Inés María del Carmen Afonso-Fernández, Ivonne Miriam Bueno, Verónica Inés Bueno, and Juan Francisco Bueno, the victim’s next of kin held to be victims in the instant case, the Court refers to the conclusions reached in the chapter regarding the violation of their right to humane treatment (supra para. 104) and deems it advisable to order in equity,98 the payment of US$ 10,000.00 (ten thousand United States dollars) to each of them, as compensation for non-pecuniary damages. * * * 206. Thus, the compensatory amounts set by the Court for non-pecuniary damages are as follows: Beneficiaries Juan Francisco Bueno-Alves Tomasa Alves de Lima (mother) Inés María del Carmen Afonso-Fernández (ex wife) Juan Francisco Bueno (son) Ivonne Miriam Bueno (daughter) Verónica Inés Bueno (daughter) Total: Amount US$ 100,000.00 US$ 10,000.00 US$ 10,000.00 US$ 10,000.00 US$ 10,000.00 US$ 10,000.00 US$ 150,000.00 207. The State shall pay the compensatory amounts set for non-pecuniary damages directly to the beneficiaries, within one year as from notice of this Judgment, under the terms set forth in paragraphs 222 and 223 infra. C) Measures of satisfaction and non-repetition guarantees 208. In this subparagraph, the Court will determine those measures of satisfaction aimed at redressing non-pecuniary damages, which will include measures to be publicly made known. a) Obligation to investigate the facts which gave rise to the violations of the instant case 96 Cf. Case of La Cantuta, supra note 14, para. 228; Case of the Miguel Castro-Castro Prison, supra note 14, paras. 440 and 441; and Case of Vargas-Areco, supra note 14, paras. 153, 155, and 156. 97 Cf. Case of La Cantuta, supra note 14, para. 219; Case of the Miguel Castro-Castro Prison, supra note 14, para. 431, and Case of Dismissed Congressional Employees (Aguado-Alfaro et al.), supra note 19, para. 147. 98 Cf. Case of La Cantuta, supra note 14, para. 219; Case of the Miguel Castro-Castro Prison, supra note 14, para. 432, and Case of Dismissed Congressional Employees (Aguado-Alfaro et al.), supra note 19, para. 151.