-60- XI OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS 174. Therefore, THE COURT DECLARES, Unanimously, that: 1. The State violated the right to freedom of thought and expression embodied in Article 13 of the American Convention on Human Rights, to the detriment of Marcel Claude Reyes and Arturo Longton Guerrero, in relation to the general obligations to respect and guarantee the rights and freedoms and to adopt provisions of domestic law established in Articles 1(1) and 2 thereof, in the terms of paragraphs 61 to 103 of this judgment. By four votes to two, that: 2. The State violated the right to judicial guarantees embodied in Article 8(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, to the detriment of Marcel Claude Reyes and Arturo Longton Guerrero, with regard to the administrative authority’s decision not to provide information, in relation to the general obligation to respect and guarantee the rights and freedoms established in Article 1(1) thereof, in the terms of paragraphs 114 to 123 of this judgment. Dissenting Judge Abreu Burelli and Judge Medina Quiroga. Unanimously, that: 3. The State violated the rights to judicial guarantees and judicial protection embodied in Articles 8(1) and 25 of the American Convention on Human Rights, to the detriment of Marcel Claude Reyes, Arturo Longton Guerrero and Sebastián Cox Urrejola, with regard to the judicial decision concerning the application for protection, in relation to the general obligation to respect and guarantee the rights and freedoms established in Article 1(1) thereof, in the terms of paragraphs 124 to 144 of this judgment. Unanimously, that: 4. This judgment constitutes, per se, a form of reparation in the terms of paragraph 156 hereof. AND DECIDES, Unanimously, that: