2 charge and at national health-care facilities, with any necessary treatment which shall comprise provision of medicines, as set forth in paragraph 238 of the instant Judgment. 15. The State must implement, on a permanent basis and within a reasonable time, human rights-oriented programs for the members of intelligence services, the Armed Forces and the National Police, as well as for prosecutors and judges, as set forth in paragraphs 240 to 242 of the instant Judgment. 16. The State must pay Andrea Gisela Ortiz-Perea, Antonia Pérez-Velásquez, Alejandrina Raida Cóndor-Saez, Dina Flormelania Pablo-Mateo, Rosario Muñoz-Sánchez, Fedor MuñozSánchez, Hilario Jaime Amaro-Ancco, Magna Rosa Perea de Ortiz, Víctor Andrés Ortiz-Torres, José Ariol Teodoro-León, Bertila Bravo-Trujillo and José Esteban Oyague-Velazco, within the term of one year, the amounts set out in paragraphs 214 and 215 of the instant Judgment, as compensation for pecuniary damage, as set forth in paragraphs 246 to 248 and 250 to 252 thereof. 17. The State must pay Antonia Pérez-Velásquez, Margarita Liliana Muñoz-Pérez, Hugo Alcibíades Muñoz-Pérez, Mayte Yu yin Muñoz-Atanasio, Hugo Fedor Muñoz-Atanasio, Carol Muñoz-Atanasio, Zorka Muñoz-Rodríguez, Vladimir Ilich Muñoz-Sarria, Rosario Muñoz-Sánchez, Fedor Muñoz-Sánchez, José Esteban Oyague-Velazco, Pilar Sara Fierro-Huamán, Carmen Oyague-Velazco, Jaime Oyague-Velazco, Demesia Cárdenas-Gutiérrez, Augusto LozanoLozano, Juana Torres de Lozano, Víctor Andrés Ortiz-Torres, Magna Rosa Perea de Ortiz, Andrea Gisela Ortiz-Perea, Edith Luzmila Ortiz-Perea, Gaby Lorena Ortiz-Perea, Natalia Milagros Ortiz-Perea, Haydee Ortiz-Chunga, Alejandrina Raida Cóndor-Saez, Hilario Jaime Amaro-Ancco, María Amaro-Cóndor, Susana Amaro-Cóndor, Carlos Alberto Amaro-Cóndor, Carmen Rosa Amaro-Cóndor, Juan Luis Amaro-Cóndor, Martín Hilario Amaro-Cóndor, Francisco Manuel Amaro-Cóndor, José Ariol Teodoro-León, Edelmira Espinoza-Mory, Bertila BravoTrujillo, José Faustino Pablo-Mateo, Serafina Meza-Aranda, Dina Flormelania Pablo-Mateo, Isabel Figueroa-Aguilar, Román Mariños-Eusebio, Rosario Carpio-Cardoso-Figueroa, Viviana Mariños-Figueroa, Marcia Claudina Mariños-Figueroa, Margarita Mariños-Figueroa de Padilla, Carmen Chipana de Flores and Celso Flores-Quispe, within the term of one year, the amounts set out in paragraph 220 of the instant Judgment, as compensation for non pecuniary damage, as set forth in paragraphs 219, 246 to 248 and 250 to 252 thereof. 18. The State must pay, within the term of one year, the amounts set out in paragraph 245 of the instant Judgment, as reimbursement for costs and expenses, which shall be delivered to Andrea Gisela Ortiz-Perea and Alejandrina Raida Cóndor-Saez, as set forth in paragraphs 246 and 249 to 252 thereof. 19. The Court shall monitor full compliance with this Judgment and the instant case shall be closed once the State implements in full the provisions herein. Within one year of the date of notification of this judgment, the State shall furnish the Court with a report on the measures taken in compliance therewith, in the terms of paragraph 253 of said judgment. Within one year from the notification of [the] Judgment, the State shall submit a report to the Court on the measures adopted in compliance therewith, as set forth in paragraph 253 [there]of. 2. The Interpretation of the Judgment on the merits, reparations and costs delivered by the Inter-American Court on November 30, 2007, whereby it decided: 1. To determine the scope of that stated in paragraphs 206(i) and 220, in relation to paragraphs 80(106) and 129 and the fifth and seventeenth operative paragraphs, of the Judgment issued on November 29, 2006 on merits, reparations, and costs in the case of La Cantuta, in the terms of paragraphs 14 through 19 of the present Judgment. 2. To request the State to take into account the full name of Mrs. Carmen Antonia Oyague Velazco de Huaman, which includes her married name, for the effects of compliance with the Judgment, in the terms of paragraph 23 of the present Judgment. 3. To declare the request for interpretation of the Judgment on merits, reparations, and costs issued on November 29, 2006 in the case of La Cantuta partially inadmissible since it does not adjust to that stated in Articles 67 of the Convention and 29(3) and 59 of the Rules of Procedure, pursuant to that stated in paragraphs 27 through 32 and 35 of the present Judgment. 4. To determine the scope of that stated in paragraphs 161, 206(h) and 206(i) and in the sixth operative paragraph of the Judgment issued on November 29, 2006 on merits, reparations, and costs in the case of La Cantuta, in the terms of paragraphs 33 through 35 of the present Judgment, in the understanding that this does not exclude the possibility that, based on that stated in the Judgment, the next of kin of the victims may exercise the domestic recourses appropriate to assert the rights that correspond to them.