34 88(7)(v) It also urged the Congress of the Republic, within a reasonable time, to replace the corresponding legislation in order to adapt the legal regime for life imprisonment to the provisions of the judgment, and to establish the maximum limits of the penalties for the crimes regulated in Articles 2, 3(b) and 3(c), 4, 5 and 9 of Decree Law No. 25,475. Finally, to regulate the ways and means of processing petitions for new trials, referred to in the conclusions of this judgment.42 88.8) The Executive issued Legislative Decrees No. 921 of January 17, 2003, No. 922 of February 11, 2003 and Nos. 923 to 927 of February 19, 2003, which, among other provisions, included the jurisprudential criteria indicated by the Constitutional Court in the judgment of January 3, 2003.43 Lori Berenson’s detention 88.9) During the afternoon of November 30, 1995, Lori Berenson was observed by members of the National Police leaving the building located on Avenida Alameda del Corregidor, and “for this reason she was subjected to careful surveillance and, given her suspicious behavior, she was detained.”44 88(10) The same November 30, 1995, Lori Berenson and Nancy Gloria Gilvonio Conde45 were detained in Lima and placed in the custody of the Peruvian police No. 010-2002-AI/TC, paras. 146, 154 and operative paragraphs (file on merits, tome VI, folios 1364 to 1433). 42 Cf. judgment handed down by the Constitutional Court of Peru on January 3, 2003, to decide a public interest action on constitutionality filed by Marcelino Tineo Silva and more than 5,000 citizens, file No. 010-2002-AI/TC, operative paragraphs (file on merits, tome VI, folios 1364 to 1433). 43 Cf. Legislative Decree No. 921 of January 17, 2003, entitled “Legislative Decree establishing the legal regime of life imprisonment in national legislation and the maximum limit of the sentence for the crimes established in Articles 2, 3, paragraphs "B" and "C", 4, 5 and 9 of Decree Law No. 25475” (file on merits, tome III, folio 627 bis); Legislative Decree No. 922-2003 of February 11, 2003, entitled “Legislative Decree that, pursuant to the judgment of the Constitutional Court File No. 010-2002-AI/TC, regulates the nullity of proceedings for the crime of treason and also establishes norms for the applicable criminal proceeding” (file on merits, tome III, folio 627 bis); Legislative Decree No. 923 of February 19, 2003, entitled “Legislative Decree that strengthens organizationally and functionally the State’s defense in relation to crimes of terrorism” (file on merits, tome III, folio 627 bis); Legislative Decree No. 924 of February 19, 2003, entitled “Legislative Decree adding a paragraph to Article 316 of the Penal Code regarding justification of the crime of terrorism” (file on merits, tome III, folio 627 bis); Legislative Decree No. 925 of February 19, 2003 entitled, “Legislative Decree regulating effective collaboration on crimes of terrorism” (file on merits, tome III, folio 627 bis); Legislative Decree No. 926 of February 19, 2003 entitled, “Legislative Decree regulating annulments of trials for crimes of terrorism before secret judges and prosecutors and application of the prohibition to raise objections” (file on merits, tome III, folio 627 bis); and Legislative Decree No. 927 of February 19, 2003, entitled “Legislative Decree regulating execution of sentence in crimes of terrorism” (file on merits, tome III, folio 627 bis). 44 Cf. police investigation report No. 140-DIVICOTE II-DINCOTE of December 27, 1995 (file of appendixes to the application, tome 3, folio 1092; file of probative evidence provided by the State, tome 2, folio 4270); charge of the Army’s Special Military Prosecutor for Cases of Treason of January 2, 1996 (file of appendixes to the application, tome 1, appendix 10, folio 102; and file of probative evidence provided by the State, tome 3, folios 4746); and testimonial statement made by Lori Berenson in the ordinary jurisdiction in file No. 154-2000 of April 4, 2001 (file of probative evidence provided by the State, tome 9, folio 7601). 45 This name also appears in the body of evidence as Rosa Mita Calle. Hereinafter, the Court will use the name Nancy Gloria Gilvonio Conde.

Seleccionar párrafo de destino3