48 Rengifo Rojas142 and Francisco Tudela Van Breugei-Douglas;143 confrontation procedures;144 site inspection;145 expert reports;146 ratifications of expert reports;147 request for documentary evidence from different public and private entities,148 and incorporation of the documentary evidence.149 142 Cf. testimonial statement by Juana Isabel Rengifo Rojas in the ordinary jurisdiction on December 14, 2000, in file No. 154-2000 (file of probative evidence provided by the State, tome 7, folios 6938 and 6939). 143 Cf. testimonial statement by Francisco Tudela Van Breugei-Douglas in the ordinary jurisdiction on December 15, 2000, in file No. 154-2000 (file of probative evidence provided by the State, tome 7, folios 6946 to 6949). 144 Cf. confrontation procedure between Pacífico Abdiel Castrellón Santamaría and Lori Berenson in the ordinary jurisdiction on December 12, 2000, in file No. 154-2000 (file of probative evidence provided by the State, tome 7, folios 6907 to 6913); confrontation procedure between the witness Rufino Miguel Romero Yompiri and Lori Berenson in the ordinary jurisdiction on December 15, 2000, in file No. 154-2000 (file of probative evidence provided by the State, tome 7, folio 6943 to 6945); confrontation procedure between Lori Berenson and the witness José Mego Arrieta in the ordinary jurisdiction on December 5, 2000, in file No. 154-2000 (file of probative evidence provided by the State, tome 7, folio 6753 and 6754); continuation of the confrontation procedure between Lori Berenson and the witness José Mego Arrieta in the ordinary jurisdiction on December 5, 2000, in file No. 154-2000 (file of probative evidence provided by the State, tome 7, folios 6757 and 6758); and confrontation procedure between Lori Berenson and the witness Lucinda Rojas Landa in the ordinary jurisdiction on December 6, 2000, in file No. 1542000 (file of probative evidence provided by the State, tome 7, folios 6774 to 6776). 145 Cf. transcript of the site inspection in the presence of the alleged victim and her lawyer in the building located at Avenida Alameda del Corregidor No. 1049, El Remanso, La Molina, on October 20, 2000 (file of probative evidence provided by the State, tome 6, folios 6190 to 6198). 146 Cf. graphology report No. 3103/00 of the Peruvian National Police, National Criminalistic Department, prepared on December 12, 2000 (file of probative evidence provided by the State, tome 7, folios 6971 to 6978). 147 Cf. procedure to ratify graphology report 075/95 carried out on September 25, 2000 (file of probative evidence provided by the State, tome 5, folios 5822 to 5823); procedure to ratify ballistics report No. 056/95 carried out on December 7, 2000 (file of probative evidence provided by the State, tome 7, folios 6779 to 6781); and procedure to ratify forensic explosives report 067/95 carried out on December 14, 2000 (file of probative evidence provided by the State, tome 7, folio 6930 and 6931). 148 Cf. communications requesting information addressed by the Examining Judge to the Embassies of Argentina, Colombia, Guatemala, Mexico, Nicaragua, Uruguay and Venezuela (file of probative evidence provided by the State, tome 5, folios 5555 to 5561); communication addressed by the Examining Judge to Department of Migration and Naturalization on September 1, 2000 (file of probative evidence provided by the State, tome 5, folio 5573); communication from the Operations Center of the National Registry of Sentences to the Military Court (file of probative evidence provided by the State, tome 5, folio 5578); certification of migratory movement issued by the Department of Migration and Displacement on September 5, 2000 (file of probative evidence provided by the State, tome 5, folio 5641); communication addressed by the Examining Judge to the company, Telefónica S.A., on September 25, 2000 (file of probative evidence provided by the State, tome 5, folio 5862); communication addressed by the Examining Judge to the Peruvian National Police on September 25, 2000 (file of probative evidence provided by the State, tome 5, folio 5863); communication addressed by the Examining Judge to the Department of Migration and Naturalization on September 25, 2000 (file of probative evidence provided by the State, tome 5, folio 5864); communication addressed by the Examining Judge to the Head of the Department of Criminalistic Technical Inspection on September 25, 2000 (file of probative evidence provided by the State, tome 5, folio 5866); communication addressed by the Examining Judge to the company, Master Call, on September 25, 2000 (file of probative evidence provided by the State, tome 5, folio 5869); communication addressed by the Examining Judge to INTERPOL on September 25, 2000 (file of probative evidence provided by the State, tome 5, folio 5870); communication addressed by the Examining Judge to the company, Tele 2000, on September 25, 2000 (file of probative evidence provided by the State, tome 5, folio 5871); communication addressed by the Examining Judge to the company, Celular 2000, on September 25, 2000 (file of probative evidence provided by the State, tome 5, folio 5872); communication addressed by the Examining Judge to the National Journalists Association on October 2, 2000 (file of probative evidence provided by the State, tome 6, folio 5971); letter accrediting Rosa Mita Calle as a correspondent of the journal, Third World Viewpoint, issued on September 1, 1995 (file of probative evidence provided by the State, tome 6, folio 6024); communication of the National Journalists Association of October 3, 2000 (file of probative evidence provided by the State, tome 6, folio