104 form of reparation.278 However, the Court considers that it is important to order other specific measures of reparation. 236. As has been proved (supra para. 88(73)), Lori Berenson was imprisoned in the Yanamayo Prison, at almost 3,800 meters above sea level, for two years and eight months, and kept for a year and a half under a regime of continuous solitary confinement, in a small cell, without ventilation, without natural light, without heating, with unhealthy food, deficient sanitary measures and inadequate medical care, which resulted in her health problems (supra para. 88(74)(v)). Also, during the first year of detention, her right to receive visits was severely restricted (supra para. 88(74)(i)). 237. The Court considers that the damage of a non-pecuniary nature caused to Lori Berenson is evident, because it is natural for any person subjected to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, such as that proved in this case, to suffer damage of a non-pecuniary nature. The Court considers that no evidence is required to reach this conclusion.279 238. The Court considers, as it as on other occasions,280 that, taking into account the health problems that Lori Berenson endured, the compensation for nonpecuniary damage should include the need for psychological and medical treatment. Hence, it is considered pertinent to order the State to offer Lori Berenson adequate, specialized medical care. 239. The Court observes that, at the domestic level, Lori Berenson was sentenced to pay the sum of S/.100,000.00 (one hundred thousand new soles) for civil reparation in favor of the State (supra para. 88(69)). In this regard, the Court considers that, owing to the pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage inflicted on Lori Berenson as a result of the violations that have been declared (supra paras. 109, 121, 150, 168, 186, 194, 199 and 226), the State should condone this debt as a form of reparation. * * * 240. Furthermore, and as it has ordered on other occasions,281 the Court considers that, as a measure of satisfaction, the State should publish the section of this judgment entitled Proven Facts, without the corresponding footnotes, and the operative paragraphs, in the official gazette and another daily newspaper with national circulation in Peru, at least once, within six months of its notification. * * * 278 Cf. Case of Tibi, supra note 3, para. 243; Case of the “Juvenile Reeducation Institute”, supra note 3, para. 299; and Case of Ricardo Canese, supra note 3, para. 205. 279 Cf. Case of Tibi, supra note 3, para. 244; Case of the “Juvenile Reeducation Institute”, supra note 3, para. 300; and Case of the Gómez Paquiyauri Brothers, supra note 16, para. 217. 280 Cf. Case of Tibi, supra note 3, para. 249; Case of Molina Theissen. Reparations, supra note 4, para. 71; and Case of Myrna Mack Chang , supra note 234, para. 266. 281 Cf. Case of Tibi, supra note 3, para. 260; Case of the “Juvenile Reeducation Institute”, supra note 3, para. 315; and Case of Ricardo Canese, supra note 3, para. 209.