4 7. That in relation to operative paragraph one of the Judgment on refraining from charging Mr. José María Cantos (hereinafter “Mr. Cantos”) the filing fee and late fee, on March 14, 2008 and February 2, 2009 the State reported that “the Federal Administration of Public Revenue (Administración Federal de Ingresos Públicos or AFIP) ordered the closing of the fiscal execution presented before the National Administrative Federal Court No. 2, Secretariat No. 4 […] which sought the judicial collection of the filing fee and late fee […]”. According to the State, this entails full compliance with the orders of the Court in the aforementioned operative paragraph, and it requested that the Court declare the closing of the proceeding for monitoring compliance therewith. 8. That the representative did not refer specifically to compliance with this obligation, even though the Court had requested that it submit complementary information on the current status of each of the reparations pending fulfillment (supra Having Seen 7). 9. That in the observations of May 21, 2008 the Commission “value[d] the State’s report” on the alleged full compliance with this obligation by indicating that the Federal Administration of Public Revenue had ordered the closing of the fiscal execution file. 10. That considering the information reported by the State and the evidence provided, this Court observes that the State has closed the fiscal execution processed before the National Administrative Court No. 2, Secretariat No. 4, which sought the judicial collection of the filing fee and late fee, which was recognized by the Commission. Therefore, this Court considers that the State has complied with the obligation contained in operative paragraph one of the Judgment. * * * 11. That with regards to operative paragraph two of the Judgment, on the obligation to set at a reasonable sum the professional fees regulated in case C-1099 of the Supreme Court of Argentina, on October 1, 2007 the State reported that it had performed the following steps: a) on January 25, 2006, the National Executive Branch ruled Decree No. 99/06, whereby it ordered, inter alia, “[to s]ummon the interested parties to establish the basis for execution of the Judgment [of the Inter-American Court] on the payment of the fees regulated in case C-1099 of the Supreme Court, under the conditions stipulated in the Court’s Judgment”; b) on May 10, 2006 the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights issued Order No. 749/2009 and “entrusted the Secretariat of Human Rights to […] perform the steps necessary to summon the interested parties […]”; c) on February 19, 2007, through Order No. 006 issued by the Secretariat of Human Rights “it was decided to summon the attorneys who represented the State and the Province of Santiago del Estero in the referenced judicial file, to establish the basis for the execution of the [J]udgment of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights”, and