7 b) “set in a reasonable sum the fees regulated in the Argentine Supreme Court case C-1099, as stipulated in paragraphs 70(b) and 74 [of the judgment;]” (second operative paragraph of the Judgment of November 28, 2002); c) “pay the fees and expenses of all experts and attorneys hired by the State and the Province of Santiago de Estero, under the conditions set forth in the preceding point” (third operative paragraph of the Judgment of November 28, 2002), and d) “lift the attachments, general property encumbrances and other measures that were ordered against the properties and business assets of Mr. José María Cantos in order to guarantee payment of the court filing fee and the professional fees” (fourth operative paragraph of the Judgment of November 28, 2002). * * * 12. That, given the nature of the instant Order, the purpose of which is to evaluate compliance with what was ordered in the Judgment of the instant case, it is inappropriate at this time to consider the allegation of the representatives that noncompliance with said Judgment would constitute a violation of due process rights (supra Having Seen paragraph 4.e). THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, by virtue of its authority to monitor compliance with its own decisions pursuant to Articles 33, 62(1), 62(3), 65, 67 and 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, and articles 25(1) and 30 of its Statute and 29(2) of its Rules of Procedure, DECLARES: 1. That it will keep open the proceeding for monitoring compliance with the aspects pending fulfillment in the present case, namely the obligations to: a) “refrain from charging Mr. José María Cantos the filing fee and fine levied for failure to pay the filing fee on time” (first operative paragraph of the Judgment of November 28, 2002); b) “set in a reasonable sum the fees regulated in the Argentine Supreme Court case C-1099, as stipulated in paragraphs 70(b) and 74 [of the