3 12. The State must adopt, within a reasonable time limit, the education, labor and other necessary measures to allow Raxcacó-Reyes to resettle in society after compliance with the sentence to be imposed under operative paragraph eight of [the] Judgment. 13. The State must publish, in the Official Gazette and a national daily newspaper, at least once within one year from the date notice of [the] Judgment is served upon it, , , the chapter on Proven Facts, paragraphs 65, 66, 72, 81, 82, 85, 86, 102 and 113 of chapters VIII, IX, X and XI, and operative paragraphs one to sixteen of [the] Judgment. The publication shall include the titles of said chapters without the corresponding footnotes. 14. The State must reimburse costs within one year from the date the notice of [the] Judgment is served upon it, as set forth in paragraph 138 of [the] Judgment. 15. The obligations of the State within the scope of the provisional measures ordered by this Court in the instant case shall be superseded by, exclusively with respect to Raxcacó-Reyes, the measures ordered in [the] Judgment, from the date the notice of [the] Judgment is served upon it. 16. In accordance with its usual practice and in compliance with its duties under the American Convention, it shall monitor the full compliance with [the] Judgment and shall consider the instant case closed upon full compliance by the State with the provisions therein. Within one year from the date the notice of [the] Judgment is served upon it, Guatemala shall submit to the Court a report on the measures taken to comply with the same. 2. The Judgment on the Merits was notified to the parties on October 5, 2005. II JURISDICTION AND COMPOSITION OF THE COURT 3. Article 67 of the Convention sets forth that [t]he judgment of the Court shall be final and not subject to appeal. In case of disagreement as to the meaning or scope of the judgment, the Court shall interpret it at the request of any of the parties, provided the request is made within ninety days from the date of notification of the judgment. 4. Pursuant to the above-mentioned article, the Court has jurisdiction to interpret its judgments and, when considering a request for interpretation, it shall be composed, whenever possible, of the same judges who delivered the judgment of which the interpretation is being sought (Article 59(3) of the Rules of Procedure). On this occasion, the Court is composed of the same judges who delivered the Judgment on the Merits the interpretation of which has been requested by the State. * III INTRODUCTION OF THE REQUEST FOR INTERPRETATION AND ITS PURPOSE 5. On November 30, 2005, the State filed a request for interpretation of the Judgment on the Merits under Articles 67 of the Convention and 59 of the Rules of Procedure. * Judge ad hoc Alejandro Sánchez Garrido did not take part in the deliberations of the instant Judgment at the venue of the Court in San José, Costa Rica; however, he was consulted prior to deliberations and ballot and agreed on the contents of the instant Judgment of interpretation.