64. Finally, the Commission considers that the petitioners did not submit sufficient evidence to characterize a violation of the right enshrined in Article 24 of the Convention. V. CONCLUSIONS 65. Based on the factual and legal considerations presented, and without prejudging the merits of the case, the Inter-American Commission concludes that the instant case satisfies the admissibility requirements established in Articles 46 and 47 of the American Convention and accordingly THE INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS, DECIDES: 1. To declare the petition under study admissible with respect to Articles 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 13, and 25 of the American Convention as they relate to the obligations established in Article 1.1 of the same instrument, and with respect to Articles I and III of the InterAmerican Convention on Forced Disappearance of Persons. 2. To declare the petition inadmissible with respect to the right enshrined in Article 24 of the American Convention. 3. To notify the State and the petitioner of this decision. 4. To initiate processing on the merits of the question. 5. To publish this decision and include it in the Annual Report to be submitted to the OAS General Assembly. Done and signed in the city of Washington, D.C., on the 4th day of the month of August 2009. (Signed) Luz Patricia Mejía, President; Víctor E. Abramovich, First Vice-president; Felipe González, Second Vice-president; Sir Clare K. Roberts, Paulo Sérgio Pinheiro, Florentín Meléndez, and Paolo G. Carozza, members of the Commission.