10 Andrade (wife); for the victim Lucio Quispe Huanaco to Sonia Martha Quispe Valle (daughter), Norma Haydee9 Quispe Valle (daughter), Walter Raúl Quispe Condori (son), Juan Fidel Quispe Condori (son), Amalia Condori Lara (wife) and Crisosta Valle Chacmana (companion); for the victim Teobaldo Ríos Lira to Isabel Estelita Ríos Pérez (niece); for the victim Manuel Isaías Ríos Pérez to Rosa Rojas Borda (wife); for the victim Javier Manuel Ríos Rojas to Rosa Rojas Borda (mother); for the victim Alejandro Rosales Alejandro to Giovanna Rosales Capillo (daughter), Elías Cirilo Rosales Medina (or Caurino) (son), Gregoria Medina Caurino (wife) and Celestina Alejandro Cristóbal (mother); for the victim Nelly María Rubina Arquiñigo to Leonarda Arquiñigo Huerta (mother), Gladys Sonia Rubina Arquiñigo (sister) and Virgilia Arquiñigo Huerta (aunt); and for the victim Odar Mender Sifuentes Minez10 to Teholulo Isidoro Sifuentes Ocampo (father) and Juliana Minez de Sifuentes (mother); and c) Finding the next of kin of the victims Odar Mender Sifuentes Minez, Benedicta Yanque Churo and Tito Ricardo Ramírez Alberto, in order to grant them the reparations ordered with regard to the facts of this case (sixth operative paragraph of the judgment on reparations of November 30, 2001). 16. That, after examining the information provided by the State and by the InterAmerican Commission and the representatives of the victims and their next of kin in their briefs on compliance with the reparations, the Court considers it essential that the State of Peru provide the Court with information on the following issues that are pending compliance: a) Investigation of the facts to determine the identity of those responsible for the human rights violations referred to in the judgment on merits, and on the public dissemination of the results of this investigation and the punishment of those responsible (fifth operative paragraph of the judgment on merits of March 14, 2001); b) Payment of the compensation owed to the beneficiaries of Benedicta Yanque Churo and Tito Ricardo Ramírez Alberto, who were still being sought when the judgment on reparations was delivered (subparagraph (b) of the second operative paragraph of the judgment on reparations of November 30, 2001); c) Payment of compensation to Martín León Lunazco11, son of the victim Máximo León León (subparagraph (c) of the second operative paragraph of the judgment on reparations of November 30, 2001); 9 The judgment on reparations indicated that the name of this beneficiary of the reparations was Norma Haydé Quispe Valle. However, after examining the briefs and evidence in the file on monitoring compliance with judgment, it was determined that the correct name of this beneficiary is Norma Haydee Quispe Valle. 10 The judgments on merits and on reparations indicated that the name of this victim was Odar Mender (or Méndez) Sifuentes Nuñez. However, after examining the briefs and evidence in the file on monitoring compliance with judgment, it was determined that the correct name of this beneficiary is Odar Mender Sifuentes Minez. 11 In its report of June 17, 2002 (supra fifth having seen paragraph), the State indicated that it had paid the beneficiaries of the victim Máximo León León, without providing details. In its comments of August 1, 2002 (supra seventh having seen paragraph), the National Human Rights Coordinator did not mention that the compensation corresponding to the beneficiary Martín León Lunazco had been paid. Consequently, in the Order of November 22, 2002, the Court requested the State to provide information on payment of the