5 i) Regarding progress concerning the signature and ratification of the International Convention on the Non-applicability of Statutory Limitations to War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity; j) Regarding the publication of the judgment of the Court in the official gazette El Peruano and the dissemination of its contents through other media; k) Regarding the inclusion in the Supreme Resolution ordering publication of the agreement on reparations of “a public expression of apology to the victims for the grave damages caused” and ratification of the determination that this type of event would never happen again; and l) Regarding the memorial to be erected. Consequently, the Court decided: 1. That the State of Peru must present to the Court by April 7, 2003, at the latest, a detailed report on the issues mentioned in the fifth considering paragraph of the [...] Order, concerning the measures taken in order to comply with the decisions of the Court in its judgment on reparations. 2. That the representatives of the victims and their next of kin, and also the InterAmerican Commission on Human Rights, must present their comments on the report of the State mentioned in the preceding operative paragraph within two months of receiving it. 10. The communication of November 29, 2002, in which the Embassy of Peru in Costa Rica presented a brief prepared by the Executive Secretariat of the National Human Rights Council (CNDH) of the Ministry of Justice of Peru, submitting information on compliance with the reparations ordered by the Court. 11. The report of the State of April 9, 2003, concerning the measures taken to comply with the rulings of the Court in its judgment on reparations. 12. The communication of the Commission of June 11, 2003, requesting an extension until June 18, 2003, to present its comments on the above-mentioned report of the State. The following day, the Secretariat of the Court (hereinafter “the Secretariat”), on the instructions of the President of the Court (hereinafter “the President”), informed the Commission that the requested extension had been granted. 13. The communication of the Commission of June 17, 2003, with which it forwarded the comments of the National Human Rights Coordinator (CNDDHH), representative of the victims and their next of kin, on the State’s report of April 9, 2003 (supra eleventh having seen paragraph). In this communication, the Commission indicated that it endorsed the comments of the National Human Rights Coordinator (CNDDHH). 14. The brief of June 25, 2003, in which the National Human Rights Coordinator (CNDDHH), representative of the victims and their next of kin, submitted its comments on the State’s report of April 9, 2003 (supra eleventh having seen paragraph), directly to the Court. 15. The brief of the State of August 25, 2003, in which it “consulted” the Court with regard to payment of the compensation corresponding to the beneficiaries who were minors mentioned in paragraph 35 and in the second operative paragraph in fine of the judgment on reparations delivered by the Court on November 30, 2001,